Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Juluke, 374 So. 2d 1259.

15 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. McKartney Young La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State v. Young 271 So. 3d 422 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
See State v. Juluke , , 1260 (La.1979) ; State v. Smith , (La.App.
State v. Clifton 248 So. 3d 691 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
In State v. Juluke , (La.
State v. Gisclair 121 So. 3d 153 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
In support of that principle, a case in which the defendant was charged with forgery, a felony, in violation of La.
State v. Fisher 105 So. 3d 964 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
the defendant was charged with forgery, a felony, in violation of LSA-R.S.
State v. Odom 993 So. 2d 663 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
(the district attorney has discretion to choose between prosecuting a defendant *669 for forgery, a felony, or unauthorized use of a credit card, a misdemeanor).
State v. Ruffins 940 So. 2d 45 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Brisco 933 So. 2d 754 La. 2006
State v. Walker 775 So. 2d 663 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
(the district attorney has discretion to choose between prosecuting a defendant for forgery, a felony, or unauthorized use of a credit card, a misdemeanor).
State v. Smith 766 So. 2d 501 La. 2000
State v. Flores 669 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Smith 597 So. 2d 1151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
(the district attorney has discretion to choose between prosecuting a defendant for forgery, a felony, or unauthorized use of a credit card, a misdemeanor).
State v. Freeman 597 So. 2d 1153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
(the district attorney has discretion to choose between prosecuting a defendant for forgery, a felony, or unauthorized use of a credit card, a misdemeanor).
State v. Baker 452 So. 2d 737 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
the Court noted that forging of a signature to a credit slip for merchandise, with the intent to defraud, describes conduct which if proved would be criminal under either La.R.S.
State v. Raymo 419 So. 2d 858 La. 1982
40:971 (B)(a)(b); see, (La.