Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Kaplan v. University Lake Corp., 381 So. 2d 385.

19 citing documents.

Autovest, L.L.C. v. Nash 197 So. 3d 258 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
(explaining, in the analogous setting, that detention by the pledgee serves as a constant acknowledgment of the debt).
City of Shreveport v. Black 194 So. 3d 1132 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Real Est. § 14:18 (2d ed.), citing
Cadlerock Joint Ventures Co. v. J. Graves Scaffolding Co. 152 So. 3d 1079 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
Again citing Succession of Picard, supra, it urges that regardless of the value of the thing pledged, the obligation of the pledg-ee to return the property continues: “Possession is the factor which serves as a *1083 constant acknowledgment of the debt.” Even if the parties revoked the contracts, the pledge would continue to interrupt prescription
Gulf National, L.L.C. v. Alfortish, Inc. 926 So. 2d 676 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
455 , (1959), referencing the pledge of the collateral mortgage note to Hibernia.
Joshua Inv. Corp. v. HOME SALES COUNSELING 892 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
SECURITY NAT. PART. LTD. PARTNER. v. Baxley 859 So. 2d 890 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
McGill v. Thigpen 780 So. 2d 1224 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
the Louisiana Supreme Court held that upon prescription of a collateral mortgage note secured by a mortgage, no outstanding mortgage remains against the property.
Diamond Services Corp. v. Benoit 780 So. 2d 367 La. 2001
3035 and 3038; (on rehearing).
Security National Partners v. Kothe 703 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Hall v. Lilly 666 So. 2d 1328 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Manuel Tire Co., Inc. v. JW Herpin, Inc. 620 So. 2d 526 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
-91 (La.1980), the Louisiana Supreme Court cited with approval from M. Nathan & G. Marshall, The Collateral Mortgage, 33 La.L.Rev.
Southland Plumbing Supply, Inc. v. Crescent Refrigeration, Inc. 542 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Allen v. Huls 517 So. 2d 188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Frank v. Motwani 513 So. 2d 1170 La. 1987
La.Civ.Code art. 2462; Quarles v. Lewis, *1172 219 La.
First State Bank & Trust Co. v. SEVEN GABLES CO. 501 So. 2d 280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Seven Gables contends, on reh'g, that one who purchases property which secures a collateral mortgage, and who assumes all obligations in a collateral mortgage and collateral mortgage note, assumes only an in rem obligation, that is, an obligation only up to the value of the property.
Bank of New Orleans v. HPB, Jr. Development 427 So. 2d 486 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
497, 507-08 (1973); -91 (La.1979).
Guaranty Sav. Assur. Co. v. NATIONAL AM. BK. 407 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
The background of this protracted litigation is extensively set forth in our earlier decision in Kaplan, supra
Nelson v. Appalachian Ins. Co. 399 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Kaplan v. University Lake Corp. 394 So. 2d 782 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
reversing the trial court's judgment, held that the collateral mortgage note bearing against G.S.A.'s property had prescribed and the mortgage was unenforceable.