Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Qualls, 377 So. 2d 293.
- State of Louisiana Versus Joshua Every La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
- In re Boothe 110 So. 3d 1002 La. 2013
- State of Louisiana v. Kevin Charles Gasaway La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
- State v. Gasaway 57 So. 3d 597 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
- State v. Pierce 799 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
- State v. Hernandez 735 So. 2d 888 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
-
State v. Snyder
750 So. 2d 832
La. 1999
l); (review of improper exclusion of blacks from jury not preserved for appeal); (objection to failure to sequester jury at an earlier time waived); (improper procedure for selecting venire not reviewable where objection was made after jury was sworn); (objection to State's use of peremptory challenges raised for first time on appeal came too late); State v. Landry, 262 La.
- State v. Williams 693 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
- State v. Campbell 673 So. 2d 1061 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
-
State v. Potter
591 So. 2d 1166
La. 1991
(objection which came during motion for mistrial immediately following closing arguments was too late); State v. Qualls, *1169 (objection raised for first time on appeal came too late).
- State v. Johnson 529 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- State v. Harris 518 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
- State v. Williams 517 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
-
State v. Foster
510 So. 2d 717
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
580 , 66 L.Ed.2d 478 (1980)
- State v. Evans 506 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
- State v. Mills 505 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
- State v. Huckaby 495 So. 2d 404 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
-
State v. Murphy
463 So. 2d 812
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Edwards, supra; (La.
- State v. Edwards 420 So. 2d 663 La. 1982
- State v. Huff 392 So. 2d 1046 La. 1980
- State v. Holmes 388 So. 2d 722 La. 1980
-
State v. Baldwin
388 So. 2d 679
La. 1980
Official Revision Comment for C.Cr.P.
-
State v. Williams
385 So. 2d 214
La. 1980
this court noted that the right to a preliminary examination is primarily designed to determine if probable cause exists to hold an accused in custody or under bail pending trial.
-
State v. Gordy
380 So. 2d 1347
La. 1980
Official Revision Comment for C.Cr.P.