Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Cheatham v. City of New Orleans, 378 So. 2d 369.

84 citing documents.

Fields v. Senior Citizens Center, Inc. 528 So. 2d 573 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Moon v. City of Baton Rouge 522 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
(jury award of $200,000 for 22-year-old widow's loss of love and affection of 27-year-old husband was reinstated after trial judge reduced award to $50,000); (La.App.
Kogos v. Payton 522 So. 2d 1198 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
4th Cir.1979), aff'd in part, rev'd in part in arguing that an off-duty policeman who becomes engaged in an altercation is within the course and scope of his employment.
Justin v. CITY OF NEW ORLEANS EX REL. MORIAL 499 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
Thomas v. State Farm Ins. Co. 499 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
[2] : $100,000.00 to wife and $40,000.00 to each of six minor children; : $200,000.00 to wife and $125,000.00 to minor child; : $7,500 to wife; : $150,000.00 to husband and $100,000.00 to each of two minor children (awards made by appellate court); Brandon v. State, Through Dept. of Highw
Hills v. American Waste & Pollution Control Co. 488 So. 2d 1244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Benelli v. City of New Orleans 478 So. 2d 1370 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Taylor v. CHARITY HOSP. OF LOUISIANA 466 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
See: Cheatham v. City of *740 New Orleans
Seal v. Bell 464 So. 2d 1026 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Terrebonne Bank & Trust Co. v. Lacombe 464 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Landaiche v. Lou-Con 461 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
it reinstated the trial court's award, which had been based upon gross income figures.
Moore v. Brumfield 459 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Hoff v. Canal Refining Co. 454 So. 2d 188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Ponder v. Groendyke Transport, Inc. 454 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Burton v. Country Boys, Inc. 446 So. 2d 904 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Prevost v. Cowan 431 So. 2d 1063 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Emerson v. Empire Fire & Marine Insurance Company
Dunaway v. Rester Refrigeration Service, Inc. 428 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Palermo v. Allstate Ins. Co. 415 So. 2d 437 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Robertson v. Parish of East Baton Rouge 415 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Badgett v. Keith 415 So. 2d 337 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
La.Civil Code Art. 1934(3)
Raley v. Carter 412 So. 2d 1045 La. 1982
we stated: "It is well settled that a judicial confession is a party's explicit admission of an adverse factual element and that it has the effect of waiving evidence as to the subject of the admission, of withdrawing the subject matter of the confession from issue."
Green v. Farmers Ins. Co. 412 So. 2d 1136 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
In conclusion and in addressing the issue of the excessiveness of the trial court's award, wherein it is stated: The law on the issue of appellate review of damages is contained in La.Const.
Franco v. Kar Products, Inc. 409 So. 2d 1238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Kleinpeter v. Williams 405 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Discussing Article 2291, stated: “The jurisprudence interpreting this statute is well settled to the effect that an admission made in a pleading is within the purview of this statute.
Batiste v. Iberia Parish School Bd. 401 So. 2d 1224 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Apparently after the original briefs were filed in our Court, the Supreme Court, pursuant to the granting of writs, reversed and held Reboul negligent, (La.
Smith v. Board of Trustees of La. 398 So. 2d 1045 La. 1981
Smith v. London 398 So. 2d 1231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Defendants’ to the effect that the allegation by appellants that Bethamie Smith was decedent’s illegitimate child constituted a judicial admission is misplaced.
Cheatham v. City of New Orleans 391 So. 2d 1324 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
Mrs. Sheryl Cheatham obtained a judgment against the City of New Orleans and others for $619,000.
Olinde v. State 391 So. 2d 1243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Henson v. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance 389 So. 2d 442 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Danna v. Howard Griffin, Inc. 388 So. 2d 446 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
Smith v. Board of Trustees 387 So. 2d 1291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
There is no merit in the plaintiff-appellant’s is dispositive of the instant case in that the retirement system stipulated that Mr. Smith was a “member in service” and can not now be heard to deny his entitlement to retirement benefits.
Hunter v. OFFICE OF HEALTH SERVICES, ETC. 385 So. 2d 928 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
As a general guideline when considering whether a trial court's award is inadequate or excessive, mandates that: The law on the issue of appellate review of damages is contained in La.Const.
Matter of Succession of Vice 385 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
The Supreme Court very recently reviewed the jurisprudence interpreting Article 2291 (La.