Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Reaves, 376 So. 2d 136.

110 citing documents.

State v. Chambers 966 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
State of Louisiana v. Michael Gordon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Scott 958 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
State v. Shanklin 953 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
State v. Williams 951 So. 2d 1158 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
State v. Guice 950 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
|4 the defendant was charged with possession of one marijuana cigarette, a misdemeanor, and trial was set and continued four times in the three and one-half months since charges had been brought.
State v. Dees 950 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
State v. Walker 947 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
the defendant was charged with possession of one marijuana cigarette, a misdemeanor, and trial was set and continued four times in the three and one-half months since charges had been brought.
State v. Bias 947 So. 2d 797 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
State v. Millet 946 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
State v. Batiste 939 So. 2d 1245 La. 2006
at 2192-93 ; (adopting Barker factors).
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS AMANDA GUTWEILER AKA AMANDA HYPES La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
2 Cir. 1984); (stating if the legislature has not specifically provided a method for raising an objection, it is properly brought by motion to quash).
State v. Gutweiler 940 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
2 Cir.1984); (stating if *164 the legislature has not specifically provided a method for raising an objection, it is properly brought by motion to quash).
State v. Brown 937 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
State v. $107,156 U.S. Currency Seized, from Marlin Morton & Richard Woods 935 So. 2d 827 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Hill 931 So. 2d 1146 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
State v. Brown 929 So. 2d 182 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
State v. Scott 913 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
State v. Batiste 904 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
State v. Gordon 896 So. 2d 1053 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
-38 (La.1979); see also State v. Davis, 95-1455, pp. 9-10 (La.App.
State v. Muhammad 875 So. 2d 45 La. 2004
State v. LeBlanc 862 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Marrero, 818 So.2d at 213
State v. Harris 857 So. 2d 16 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
However, where several continuances were caused by the police officers not appearing for trial, the court found that the responsibility for the delay rested with the State.
State v. Love 847 So. 2d 1198 La. 2003
State v. Marrero 818 So. 2d 211 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Pointer 781 So. 2d 626 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
wherein the Louisiana Supreme Court upheld the trial court’s granting of a Motion to Quash after a three and one-half month delay between the filing of the Bill of Information on a misdemeanor marijuana charge and the trial court’s denial of the State’s fourth continuance.
State v. Ray 721 So. 2d 974 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
State v. Gray 766 So. 2d 550 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
State v. Shorts 705 So. 2d 1237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
the defendant was charged with possession of one marijuana cigarette, a misdemeanor, and trial was set and continued four times in the three and one-half months since charges had been brought.
State v. Pham 692 So. 2d 11 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
2182 , 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972)
State v. Price 690 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
State v. Cowger, 581 So.2d at 286
State v. DeRouen 678 So. 2d 39 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
NOTES [1] where the Court upheld the quashing of a misdemeanor marijuana charge.
Overruled State v. Davis 677 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Wilson 672 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Esteen 672 So. 2d 1098 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
State v. Reaves ( citation omitted ).
State v. Firshing 624 So. 2d 921 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
State v. Butler 615 So. 2d 496 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
State v. Leban 611 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
State v. Cowger 581 So. 2d 283 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
State v. Beauchamp, supra, at 28 .
State v. Martin 558 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Peters 546 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Gale 526 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
State v. Lollis 521 So. 2d 532 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
required quashing the information "in this case of four continuances for the absence of the prosecution witness in a simple, non-violent offense."
State v. Beauchamp 510 So. 2d 22 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Leonard 499 So. 2d 585 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Johnson 496 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
2182 , 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972)
State v. Pleasant 489 So. 2d 1005 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
the Louisiana Supreme Court concluded that a defendant who had not moved for a speedy trial had nonetheless been denied this right and sustained a trial court's ruling which quashed the prosecution.
State v. Penny 486 So. 2d 879 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Johnston 480 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Lang 464 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985