DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Collins, 378 So. 2d 928.

35 citing documents.

  • Dan Cole, Sr. v. James J. Petitjean La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Jones 822 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • Rodriguez v. Deen 759 So. 2d 1032 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
  • State v. Guillory 715 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
  • State v. Hebert 676 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • Wolfe v. Wiener Enterprises, Inc. 648 So. 2d 1293 La. 1995
  • State v. Young 642 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    _ [P]robable cause may exist when the commission of a crime has not been definitely established, but is reasonably probable under the totality of the known circumstances.” Id.
  • State v. Head 598 So. 2d 1202 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
  • State v. Powell 598 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
    See State v. Massey, supra; cert.
  • State v. Simms 571 So. 2d 145 La. 1990
  • Moresi v. State, Dept. of Wildlife & Fisheries 567 So. 2d 1081 La. 1990
    U.S. v. Pollock, 739 F.2d 187 (5th Cir.1984); (La.
  • State v. Swaingan 563 So. 2d 1204 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • State v. Hampton 508 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Fraser 484 So. 2d 122 La. 1986
  • State v. Fraser 471 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Lard 459 So. 2d 1189 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Tuesno 456 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    : "When the arrest or search is made when the police do not know that a crime has been committed, more and better evidence is needed to prove that probable cause exists for the arrest than is the case when the police know a crime has been committed."
  • State v. Farber 446 So. 2d 1376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    stated: where this Court reasoned: "Probable cause to arrest exists when facts and circumstances within the arresting officer's knowledge and of which he has reasonable and trustworthy information are sufficient to justify a man of average caution in the belief that the person to be arrested has committed or is com
  • State v. Goodson 444 So. 2d 1337 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Beck 445 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    as follows: Probable cause to arrest exists when facts and circumstances within the arresting officer's knowledge and of which he has reasonable and trustworthy information are sufficient to justify a man of *475 average caution in the belief that the person to be arrested has committed or is committing an o
  • State v. Lingle 436 So. 2d 456 La. 1983
  • State v. Square 433 So. 2d 104 La. 1983
  • State v. Tokman 412 So. 2d 561 La. 1982
  • State v. Jones 408 So. 2d 1285 La. 1982
    this court commented: "One of the most important elements in determining whether probable cause existed is satisfied when the police know a crime has actually been committed.
  • State v. Davis 407 So. 2d 666 La. 1981
  • State v. Bickham 404 So. 2d 929 La. 1981
  • State v. Nicholas 397 So. 2d 1308 La. 1981
    : "One of the most important elements in determining whether probable cause existed is satisfied when the police know a crime has actually been committed.
  • State v. Haynie 395 So. 2d 669 La. 1981
    The standard to establish probable cause to arrest in such a cert.
  • State v. Bell 395 So. 2d 805 La. 1981
  • State v. Brown 395 So. 2d 1301 La. 1981
    where this Court reasoned: "Probable cause to arrest exists when facts and circumstances within the arresting officer's knowledge and of which he has reasonable and trustworthy information are sufficient to justify a man of average caution in the belief that the person to be arrested has committed or is com
  • State v. Mosley 390 So. 2d 1302 La. 1980
    The state and the defense agree that the applicable standard for testing probable *1304 as follows: Probable cause to arrest exists when facts and circumstances within the arresting officer's knowledge and of which he has reasonable and trustworthy information are sufficient to justify a man of average caution in the belief that the person to be arrested has committed or is committing an offens
  • State v. Clark 387 So. 2d 1124 La. 1980
    (La.1980); State v. Williams , No. 64,987, (La., March 3, 1980) (rehearing granted); (remanded for further proceedings); (reversed and remanded for new trial); (La.
  • State v. Williams 392 So. 2d 619 La. 1980
  • State v. Williams 383 So. 2d 369 La. 1980
  • State v. Normand 380 So. 2d 1207 La. 1980