DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dupree, 377 So. 2d 328.

21 citing documents.

  • State Of Louisiana v. Kenneth Smith La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
  • State v. Mims 907 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    were not met in this instance.
  • State of Louisiana v. Vernon Leon Cox La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Cox 876 So. 2d 932 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Hearold 567 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
  • State v. Wille 559 So. 2d 1321 La. 1990
  • State v. Simmons 518 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • Boneno v. Lasseigne 514 So. 2d 276 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Walters 514 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Quinn 517 So. 2d 964 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    at 330 (La.1979) explained these requirements and stated: “Before a co-conspirator’s declaration may be introduced under this exception, a prima facie case of conspiracy must have been established and it must be shown that the declaration was made in furtherance of the common enterprise and during its continuation, (c
  • State v. Koll 463 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    at 330 (La.1979), the Louisiana Supreme Court explained these requirements: Before a co-conspirator’s declaration may be introduced under this exception, a prima facie case of conspiracy must have been established and it must be shown that the declaration was made in furtherance of the common enterprise and during its
  • State v. Ester 458 So. 2d 1357 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Orlando 456 So. 2d 1021 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Dore 443 So. 2d 644 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    C. McCormick, Evidence, sec.
  • Explained State v. Johnson 438 So. 2d 1091 La. 1983
    : Before a co-conspirator's declaration may be introduced under this exception, a prima facie case of conspiracy must have been established and it must be shown that the declaration was made in furtherance of the common enterprise and during its continuation.
  • State v. Keller 431 So. 2d 78 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Terracina 430 So. 2d 64 La. 1983
  • Board of Com'rs v. Louisiana Com'n on Ethics 416 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
  • Explained State v. Meredith 403 So. 2d 712 La. 1981
  • State v. Boudreaux 396 So. 2d 1303 La. 1981
  • State v. Provo 396 So. 2d 1298 La. 1981
    this court observed: "Before a co-conspirator's declaration may be introduced under this exception, a prima facie case of conspiracy must have been established and it must be shown that the declaration was made in furtherance of the common enterprise and during its continuation."