Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Clay v. Clay, 389 So. 2d 31.

47 citing documents.

Eric A. Lannon v. Pherian, LLC La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
App. 2 Cir. 4/3/02), ( (La.
1900 St. Ann LLC and John W. Holmes Versus Tracy Williams and Flawless Construction LLC La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
Ware v. Foremost Insurance Co. 223 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
English Turn Property Owners Ass'n v. Taranto 219 So. 3d 381 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
As the Louisiana Supreme Court explained, summary proceedings [like quo warranto hearings] “are those which are conducted with rapidity within the delays allowed by the court, and without citation and the observance of all formalities required in ordinary proceedings.” -35 (La.
Antwine v. Winfield 203 So. 3d 454 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Winstead v. Kenyon 182 So. 3d 1087 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
13:3201; Just as personal jurisdiction over .-residents cannot be maintained without valid personal or domiciliary service as required by law, personal jurisdic- .
In the Interest of Edwards v. Mathieu 163 So. 3d 110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
“A default judgment may not be taken against a person who had not received citation and service thereof.” Id.
Folse v. St. Rose Farms, Inc. 165 So. 3d 104 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
(holding that a default judgment may not be taken against a person who has not received citation and service).
Metro City Redevelopment Coalition, Inc. v. Brockman 143 So. 3d 495 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Thornton v. Carthon 114 So. 3d 554 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
Collier v. Landry 115 So. 3d 31 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Louisiana Workers’ Comp.
Harold A. Asher, CPA, LLC v. Haik 116 So. 3d 720 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
for the proposition that addressing the certified mail to Rav-enne Lane instead of Ravenna Lane violated the mandatory “strict compliance” with La.
Howard v. Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Corp. 65 So. 3d 697 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
“Generally, summary proceedings are allowed in instances where the issue to be resolved is narrow and/or the need for rapid adjudication is great.”
Moody v. Stevenson 980 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
Kelda Wells v. Melvin Price La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Louisiana Workers' Compensation Corp. v. Pro Source Roofing, Inc. 907 So. 2d 113 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Hale v. Liljeberg 895 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
International Stevedores, (La.App.
Corte v. Cash Technologies, Inc. 843 So. 2d 1162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Trettin v. Trettin 839 So. 2d 1272 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Mitchell v. Bass 835 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
RHODES STEEL BLDGS. v. Walker Const. Co. 813 So. 2d 1171 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
McFarland v. Dippel 756 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Banque De Depots v. Bozel Mineracao E Ferroligas 728 So. 2d 533 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Rando v. Rando 722 So. 2d 1165 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Collier v. Fugler 694 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Davis v. Tele-Total, Inc., (La.App.
Barnett Marine, Inc. v. Van Den Adel 694 So. 2d 453 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
Teknika Electronics Corp. v. Satellite Earth Stations of Louisiana, Inc. 673 So. 2d 1129 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Dean v. Waters 667 So. 2d 1137 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Hebert v. Abbey Healthcare Group, Inc. 657 So. 2d 278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Abbey contends that a nonresident defendant in a summary proceeding may not be served under the long-arm statute.
Mayo v. Tillman Aero, Inc. 640 So. 2d 314 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Delay v. Charbonnet 627 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Warren v. McNair 622 So. 2d 864 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Scalfano v. Morris 606 So. 2d 61 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
to permit the courts of Louisiana to tap the full potential of in personam jurisdiction over non-residents *63 consistent with the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment.” at page 37, and citations therein.
Atkins v. Atkins 588 So. 2d 407 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
De Reyes v. Marine Mgt. and Consulting 586 So. 2d 103 La. 1991
See Superior Supply Co. v. Associated Pipe & Supply Co., (La.
Succession of Ackel 563 So. 2d 890 La. 1990
2591, 2592(1) & (5), and 3229; (La.
Castiel v. Hegenbarth 539 So. 2d 931 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Bowman v. Weill Const. Co. 502 So. 2d 133 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Funai v. Air Center, Inc. 499 So. 2d 669 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
International Stevedores, Inc. v. Hanlon 499 So. 2d 1183 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Martinez v. Reed 490 So. 2d 303 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
to support their position.
Decca Leasing Corp. v. Torres 465 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
at p. 37 and citations therein.
Davis v. Tele-Total, Inc. 465 So. 2d 948 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Olano v. Marigny Royal 464 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Broyles v. Hart 454 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Stuckey v. Stuckey 434 So. 2d 513 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Quasha v. Shale Development Corp., supra
Investor Inns, Inc. v. Wallace 408 So. 2d 978 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
sustained defendant's exception to jurisdiction for reasons closely akin to those set out by this court.