Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Thibodeaux, 380 So. 2d 59.

40 citing documents.

  • State Of Louisiana v. Ladarious Brown La. 2022
  • State Of Louisiana v. Ronald Gasser La. 2022
    art. 813, “[i]f the court finds that the verdict is incorrect in form or is not responsive to the indictment, it shall refuse to receive it, and shall remand the jury with the necessary oral instructions.” As our jurisprudence indicates, where a “verdict is clearly non -responsive,” it should [be] refused by the trial court in accordance with Article 813.” (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Cody Nicholas Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
  • State of Louisiana v. Randy Keith Baldridge, II La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
    3 Cir. 2/6/13) (unpublished opinion)2
  • State of Louisiana v. Chadwick McGhee La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
  • State of Louisiana v. Chadwick McGhee La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
  • State v. McGhee 265 So. 3d 819 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    1986) ; State v. Thibodeaux , (La.
  • State v. McGhee 252 So. 3d 895 La. 2018
    1986) ; State v. Thibodeaux , (La.
  • State v. Anderson 248 So. 3d 415 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    2 See State v. Thibodeaux , , 60-61 (La.
  • State v. Warrick 186 So. 3d 1263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    stolen property after finding the verdict was, nonresponsive and did not clearly convey the jury’s intent to find the defendant guilty as charged or guilty of a lesser and included grade of.the offense), (where the supreme court found reversible error in a non-responsive jury verdict where the trial court improperly *1267 charged the jury and the list of responsive verdicts given to the jury was wrong).
  • State of Louisiana v. William Shupp La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
  • State v. Shupp 185 So. 3d 900 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State v. Tucker 170 So. 3d 394 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    2 Cir.1991), writ denied, (1991)
  • State v. Jones 156 So. 3d 126 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State of Louisiana v. Lawrence Akeem Blade La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    Defendant was charged with distribution of amobarbital and secobarbital and was convicted of possession with intent to distribute a controlled dangerous substance.
  • State v. Friday 73 So. 3d 913 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State in the Intrest of M.L. L. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State ex rel. M.L.L. 994 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • State Ex Rel. Mll 994 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Froiland 910 So. 2d 956 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    the supreme court reversed a defendant's conviction and remanded for a new trial after an error patent review revealed a non-responsive verdict.
  • State v. Norman 848 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Shepherd 839 So. 2d 1103 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Maxie 773 So. 2d 198 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    at 572 ; see also, (trial court is without authority to vary or to add to the prescribed verdicts of La.C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Sloan 747 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
  • State v. Brown 684 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    is similar to the case at bar.
  • State v. Campbell 670 So. 2d 1212 La. 1996
  • State v. George 661 So. 2d 975 La. 1995
  • State v. Washington 647 So. 2d 1353 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    the Court held: “While the trial court may ‘exclude’ one of the listed responsive verdicts, it cannot add to their number.” the Court stated: “When responsive verdicts are mandated by Article 814, the trial court is without authority to vary or add to the prescribed verdicts.” like the present case, | involved the request for instructions on a lesser included offense which had been
  • State v. Duke 625 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    (conviction reversed; list of verdicts and judge's charge was incorrect and jury returned a verdict which was non-responsive).
  • State v. Major 597 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
  • State v. Moseley 587 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Mayeux 526 So. 2d 1243 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Mayeux 498 So. 2d 701 La. 1986
  • State v. Bowman 491 So. 2d 1380 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Mayeux 485 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Foret 479 So. 2d 526 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Freeman 447 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Johnson 440 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Square 433 So. 2d 104 La. 1983
  • State Ex Rel. Elaire v. Blackburn 424 So. 2d 246 La. 1982