Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Harris v. State Through Huey P. Long Mem. Hosp., 378 So. 2d 383.

16 citing documents.

Perniciaro v. Martin Marietta Corp. 613 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Lucas v. St. Frances Cabrini Hosp. 562 So. 2d 999 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Nathan v. Home Depot 522 So. 2d 712 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Johnson v. Patcraft Mills, Inc. 486 So. 2d 1178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
1st Cir.1980), writ denied
Olson v. Ins. Co. of State of Pa. 471 So. 2d 1151 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Brossett v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 467 So. 2d 121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Mallet v. La. Nursing Homes, Inc. 459 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Doyle v. United General Ins. Co. 458 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Belmon v. St. Frances Cabrini Hosp. 427 So. 2d 541 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Phillips v. Skate Country East 420 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
In the absence of manifest error, the appellate court is not to disturb the finding of the jury which has evidence before it furnishing a reasonable factual basis for its verdict, based on its reasonable evaluation of credibility; the record does not reveal that the finding is clearly wrong or manifestly erroneous.
Daniel v. ST. FRANCIS CABRINI HOSP. ETC. 415 So. 2d 586 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
3 Cir. 1979), affirmed, (La.
Jefferson v. Landwehr 409 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Arceneaux v. Domingue, supra .
Babineaux v. Continental Oil Co. 407 So. 2d 1323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Canter v. Koehring Company, supra; Arceneaux v. Domingue, writ granted, on remand, (La.App.
Robillard v. P & R RACETRACKS, INC. 405 So. 2d 1203 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
In the absence of manifest error, the appellate court is not to disturb the finding of the jury which has evidence before it furnishing a reasonable factual basis for its verdict, based on its reasonable evaluation of credibility; the record does not reveal that the finding is clearly wrong or manifestly erroneous
Ray v. Ameri-Care Hospital 400 So. 2d 1127 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Putt v. Daussat 381 So. 2d 955 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
Hosp., that: "In connection with the standard to be applied by an appellate court in its constitutionally mandated review, the review of fact made by an appellate court must determine whether the district court was clearly wrong in its factual findings.