Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sterling, 376 So. 2d 103.

20 citing documents.

State of Louisiana Versus Dan Robertson La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Derrick James Lambert -Aka Derrick Lambert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
at page 104 (La.1979): 4 “[A] preliminary examination does not determine the validity of the charge brought against a defendant, but rather determines whether or nor there is probable cause to deprive the defendant of his
State of Louisiana v. Steve Duane Williams -Aka- Ayaz Sutaria La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
: [A] preliminary examination does not determine the validity of the charge brought against a defendant, but rather determines whether or not there is probable cause to deprive the defendant of his liberty.
State v. Williams 201 So. 3d 379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
: [A] preliminary examination does not determine the validity of the charge brought against a defendant, but rather determines whether or not there is probable cause to deprive the defendant of his liberty.
State of Louisiana v. William Shupp La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
State v. Shupp 185 So. 3d 900 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Explained State v. Drayton 63 So. 3d 319 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
the finding of no probable cause after a preliminary examination merely releases the defendant from custody or bail for that charge but does not determine the validity of the charge or preclude the filing of an indictment or bill of information against him for the same offense.
State v. Lewis 28 So. 3d 548 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
: [A] preliminary examination does not determine the validity of the charge brought against a defendant, but rather determines whether or nor there is probable cause to deprive the defendant of his liberty.
State v. Lyons 18 So. 3d 1293 La. 2009
State v. Jackson 809 So. 2d 1127 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
at page 104 (La.1979): “[A] preliminary examination does not determine the validity of the charge brought against a defendant, but rather determines whether or nor there is probable cause to deprive the defendant of his liberty.” Id., at 193-194 .
State v. Sullivan 729 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Burns 602 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
at page 104 (La.1979): "[A] preliminary examination does not determine the validity of the charge brought against a defendant, but rather determines whether or nor there is probable cause to deprive the defendant of his liberty."
State v. Blair 582 So. 2d 848 La. 1991
State v. Debat 582 So. 2d 849 La. 1991
State v. Sanders 539 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Foster 510 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Hawkins 496 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Mayberry 457 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Williams 397 So. 2d 1287 La. 1981
State v. Johnston 376 So. 2d 1236 La. 1979