DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dousay, 378 So. 2d 414.

40 citing documents.

  • State v. Interiano 868 So. 2d 9 La. 2004
  • State v. Palermo 765 So. 2d 1155 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Palermo 765 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Smith 729 So. 2d 648 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • Distinguished Fields v. State 714 So. 2d 1244 La. 1998
    See, which required that a person having authority over a sewage treatment plant "take all usual and all reasonable measures and precautions to secure and ensure the property operation" of the plant.
  • State v. Boyd 710 So. 2d 1074 La. 1998
  • State v. Byrd 708 So. 2d 401 La. 1998
    The trial court based its ruling upon two cases dealing with constitutional vagueness
  • State v. Hookfin 602 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
  • State v. Ritchie 590 So. 2d 1139 La. 1991
    in a careless, reckless or negligent manner", intended to proscribe ordinary negligence, and (2) whether the terms "immoderate rate of speed" and "careless, reckless or negligent manner" and Papachristou v. City of Jacksonville, 405 U.S. 156 , 92 S.Ct.
  • State v. Wilson 588 So. 2d 733 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • State in Interest of JAV 558 So. 2d 214 La. 1990
    State v. Barthelemy, supra ; State v. Union Tank Car Co., *216 -86 (La.1983)
  • State v. Conway 556 So. 2d 1323 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
  • State v. Spooner 550 So. 2d 1289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Cohen 549 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Coleman 528 So. 2d 192 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Powell 515 So. 2d 1085 La. 1987
    Const. 1974, Art. I, §§ 2, 13; -17 (La.1979); (La.
  • State v. Lambert 514 So. 2d 550 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Pierre 500 So. 2d 382 La. 1987
  • State v. Griffin 495 So. 2d 1306 La. 1986
  • State v. Hudnall 480 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    839 , 31 L.Ed.2d 110 (1972)
  • State v. Hill 475 So. 2d 1123 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Cuevas 466 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
    2294 , 33 L.Ed.2d 22 (1972)
  • State v. Robertson 464 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    -417 (La.1979), appears the following: The constitutional requirement of definiteness which must be satisfied by a *766 regulation which is accompanied by penal sanctions emanates from the due process clauses of the United States and Louisiana Constitutions, from Article 1, § 13 of the Louisiana Constitution, Righ
  • State v. Bertrand 461 So. 2d 1159 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • State v. David 468 So. 2d 1126 La. 1984
  • State v. Liuzza 457 So. 2d 664 La. 1984
  • State v. Davis 448 So. 2d 645 La. 1984
  • State v. McKeel 443 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    367 (1952); State v. Cannon, supra
  • State v. Gill 441 So. 2d 1204 La. 1983
    : "Two fundamental concepts are embodied in the principle that the vagueness of a criminal enactment may render it unconstitutional.
  • State v. Broom 439 So. 2d 357 La. 1983
    As noted by the trial judge, this Court set forth two guidelines that must be considered in determining whether a statute is unconstitutionally vague.
  • State v. Union Tank Car Co. 439 So. 2d 377 La. 1983
  • State v. Stilley 416 So. 2d 928 La. 1982
  • City of Lake Charles v. Henning 414 So. 2d 331 La. 1982
    Schopler, Annotation, Indefiniteness of Language as Affecting Validity of Criminal Legislation or Judicial Definition of Common-Law Crime—Supreme Court Cases, 16 L.Ed.2d 1231 (1966).
  • State v. Farris 412 So. 2d 1039 La. 1982
    Schopler, Annotation, Indefiniteness of Language as Affecting Validity of Criminal Legislation or Judicial Definitions of Common-Law Crime—Supreme Court Cases, 16 L.Ed.2d 1231 (1966).
  • State v. Jackson 404 So. 2d 952 La. 1981
    *954 compelled his finding that the statute was unconstitutional.
  • State v. Pearaa 403 So. 2d 1194 La. 1981
    “ the court stated: ‘With regard to the requirement of adequate notice, this court has held that the constitutional guarantee that an accused shall be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation against him requires that a penal statute must describe unlawful conduct with sufficient particularity and
  • State v. Prestridge 399 So. 2d 564 La. 1981
    367 (1952); State v. Cannon, supra; see also
  • State v. Passman 391 So. 2d 1140 La. 1980
    [3] In support of this argument, n.2 (La.1979), where the court stated: "It should be noted ...
  • State v. McCoy 395 So. 2d 319 La. 1980
  • State v. Cannon 383 So. 2d 389 La. 1980
    the court stated: "With regard to the requirement of adequate notice, this court has held that the constitutional guarantee that an accused shall be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation against him requires that a penal statute must describe unlawful conduct with sufficient particularity and