DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lee, 381 So. 2d 792.

14 citing documents.

  • State v. Charleston 764 So. 2d 322 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    (“The jury was properly told to consider flight as evidence of guilt only if they believed the men were fleeing the scene of the automobile accident because they had committed the crime for which they were on trial.”) (); see 2 McCormick on Evidence, § 263, at 183 (Strong ed. 1992) (“In recent years, a number of courts have begun to look with particular care at the timing of the flight relative to the offense and the strength of the inference that in fleeing the defendant was aware of, and motiv
  • State v. Bordenave 678 So. 2d 19 La. 1996
    ("The jury was properly told to consider flight as evidence of guilt only if they believed the men were fleeing the scene of the automobile accident because they had committed the crime for which they were on trial.") (); see 2 McCormick on Evidence, § 263, at 183 (Strong ed. 1992) ("In recent years, a number of courts have begun to look with particular care at the timing of the flight relative to the offense and the strength of the inference that in fleeing the defendant was aware of, and motiv
  • State v. Bordenave 660 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
  • State v. Broussard 649 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
  • State v. Thompson 544 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Matthieu 527 So. 2d 530 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    to show that the trial court committed reversible error in not granting a mistrial.
  • State v. Richardson 466 So. 2d 762 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    ore the evidence is introduced at all, there must be clear and convincing evidence of the commission of other crimes and the defendant’s connection therewith; (2) the evidence of the accused’s conduct must be substantially relevant to show his consciousness of guilt of the crime charged; (3) the probative value of the extraneous crimes evidence must outweigh its prejudicial effect.” In the instant case, we cannot say that Officer Duffy’s testimony shows “clear *764 and convincing evidence” of or
  • State v. Davenport 445 So. 2d 1190 La. 1984
  • State v. Lingle 436 So. 2d 456 La. 1983
  • State v. Washington 430 So. 2d 641 La. 1983
  • State v. Washington 430 So. 2d 641 La. 1983
  • State v. Parker 421 So. 2d 834 La. 1982
    It was only in response to the defense motion that the judge was prompted to consider the limits of the flight/
  • State v. Belgard 410 So. 2d 720 La. 1982
  • State v. Molinario 383 So. 2d 345 La. 1980
    State v. Lee, No. 65,064