Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Nall, 379 So. 2d 731.
- State v. Johnson 544 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
- State v. Lewis 539 So. 2d 1199 La. 1989
- State v. Malbroux 485 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
-
State v. Robbins
471 So. 2d 912
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
cf. Cooper v. United States, 594 F.2d 12 (4th Cir. 1979).
-
State v. Helsley
457 So. 2d 707
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
the Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether the defendant has the right to compel compliance with a plea bargain.
- State v. Cooper 449 So. 2d 1376 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
-
State v. Burdgess
434 So. 2d 1062
La. 1983
Since that statement was found to be involuntary and suppressed by this court, the defendant contends that his statement was "fruit of the poison tree" and therefore not admissible.
-
State v. Bosworth
415 So. 2d 912
La. 1982
[20] See Santobello v. New York above
-
State v. Caminita
411 So. 2d 13
La. 1982
the prosecuting attorney promised to reduce the charges against an accused in return for *16 the accused's testimony against his co-defendant.