Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Gordy, 380 So. 2d 1347.

46 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. In The Interest Of H.J. La. 2021
State v. Jenkins 226 So. 3d 436 La. 2017
1980) (“The grant or denial of a recess is largely within the discretion of the trial court.”); (La.
State v. Howard 106 So. 3d 1038 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. Nicholas Demond Pitree La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Pitree 930 So. 2d 265 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Maten 899 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
State v. Hampton 750 So. 2d 867 La. 1999
State v. Gibson 668 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
also a case involving a jury trial, the Court found that the defendant’s mere allegations, that the judge had represented him in prior cases and that an officer had told him that the judge had threatened to put the defendant away for the maximum amount of time if he came before him, did not mandate that the
State v. Howard 649 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
State v. Fanguy 643 So. 2d 860 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
State v. Dugar 643 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
State v. Wiley 614 So. 2d 862 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
and State v. Hall, supra .
State v. Miles 613 So. 2d 1047 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Segura v. Andries 610 So. 2d 188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Fann 597 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
State v. Jones 596 So. 2d 1360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
See also: -1148 (La.1981); -1354 (La.1980).
State v. Burrell 561 So. 2d 692 La. 1990
State v. Wille 559 So. 2d 1321 La. 1990
State v. Rogers 553 So. 2d 453 La. 1989
art. 709; State v. Bland, 253 La.
State v. Richard 550 So. 2d 300 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Pierce v. Charity Hosp. of Louisiana 550 So. 2d 211 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Brown 546 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Bonhomme 544 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Simon 544 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Everett 530 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
the Louisiana Supreme Court addressed the issue of the introduction of demonstrative evidence.
State v. Ford 525 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Hernandez 513 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
1330 , 79 L.Ed.2d 725 (1983)
State v. Hebert 507 So. 2d 311 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Brooks 499 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
State v. Mitchell 498 So. 2d 1190 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
State v. McCarty 499 So. 2d 292 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Cann 494 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. McCullom 480 So. 2d 430 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Guerra 467 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Jones 467 So. 2d 147 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Washington 463 So. 2d 11 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
art. 712 and the Official Revision Comment thereunder
State v. Robinson 461 So. 2d 403 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
at 1352 (La., 1980): "To admit demonstrative evidence at trial, the law requires that the object be identified.
State v. Jackson 450 So. 2d 621 La. 1984
State v. Warren 437 So. 2d 836 La. 1983
State v. Tonubbee 420 So. 2d 126 La. 1982
State v. Felde 422 So. 2d 370 La. 1982
State v. Sharp 414 So. 2d 752 La. 1982
at 1352 (La.,1980): "To admit demonstrative evidence at trial, the law requires that the object be identified.
State v. Howard 414 So. 2d 1210 La. 1982
State v. Washington 407 So. 2d 1138 La. 1981
State v. Washington 407 So. 2d 1138 La. 1981
State v. Baldwin 388 So. 2d 679 La. 1980