Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Doughty, 379 So. 2d 1088.
- State v. McMooain 680 So. 2d 1370 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
- State v. Smith 676 So. 2d 1068 La. 1996
-
State v. Taylor
663 So. 2d 336
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
See State v. Doughty [ ], supra.
- State v. Marshall 660 So. 2d 819 La. 1995
- State v. Smith 647 So. 2d 1321 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
-
State v. Burton
649 So. 2d 694
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
“Where multiple punishment has been erroneously imposed, the appropriate procedure at the appellate level is to eliminate the judgment as to the less severely punishable offense.”
- State ex rel. Jones v. Whitley 629 So. 2d 1155 La. 1993
-
State v. Head
598 So. 2d 1202
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
State v. Didier, 262 La.
- State v. Powell 598 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
-
State v. Welch
584 So. 2d 1211
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
As we understand Adams, the general rule, where *1212 resentencing is available, is to vacate both “interdependent” sentences and restructure a “new” sentence “that is no more severe than the defendant’s original composite sentence.” Where resentencing is not available, the general rule is to vacate the conviction and the sentence of the less severely punishable offense.
- State v. Smith 580 So. 2d 912 La. 1991
- State v. Edgar 573 So. 2d 1128 La. 1991
- State v. Neville 572 So. 2d 1161 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
-
State v. Gibson
572 So. 2d 666
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
a case very similar to the instant one.
- State v. Brown 567 So. 2d 1152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
-
State v. Davis
560 So. 2d 997
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
The court vacated the aggravated arson conviction, the less severely punishable offense
- State Ex Rel. Adams v. Butler 558 So. 2d 552 La. 1990
- State v. Lee 554 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
- State v. George 539 So. 2d 987 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- State v. Jones 525 So. 2d 1149 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
-
State v. Bradford
514 So. 2d 534
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
in such cases, where multiple punishment has been erroneously imposed, "the appropriate procedure at the appellate level is to eliminate the effect of the judgment as to the the less severely punishable offense."
- State ex rel. Norwood v. Blackburn 511 So. 2d 1143 La. 1987
-
State v. Payton
496 So. 2d 1068
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
We vacate Joseph Rogers' conviction and sentence for aggravated arson, the less severely punishable offense, at 1091 (La.1980).
- State v. Nicholas 491 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
- State v. Smith 475 So. 2d 331 La. 1985
- State v. Holmes 475 So. 2d 1057 La. 1985
- State v. Dubaz 468 So. 2d 554 La. 1985
-
State v. Cureaux
467 So. 2d 1377
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
2221 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977); (La.
- State v. Holmes 462 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
-
State v. Rogers
462 So. 2d 684
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
We vacate Joseph Rogers' conviction and sentence for aggravated arson, the less severely punishable offense, at 1091 (La.1980).
-
State v. Smith
461 So. 2d 417
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
the Louisiana Supreme Court defined forgery as: “The false making or altering with the intent to defraud, of any signature to, or any part of, any writing purporting to have legal efficacy; or (underlined for emphasis) issuing or transferring, with intent to defraud, a forged writing known by the offe
- State v. Hope 449 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
-
State v. Coody
448 So. 2d 100
La. 1984
2072, 2076 , 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969)
-
State v. Cotten
438 So. 2d 1156
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
2221 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977)
-
State v. Vaughn
431 So. 2d 763
La. 1983
(La.1980; State v. Didier, 262 La.
-
State v. Guajardo
428 So. 2d 468
La. 1983
2072 , 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969)
- State v. Chaisson 425 So. 2d 745 La. 1983
- State v. Hayes 412 So. 2d 1323 La. 1982
-
State v. Fontenot
408 So. 2d 919
La. 1981
and the "same evidence" test
- State v. Foy 401 So. 2d 948 La. 1981
-
State v. Beavers
394 So. 2d 1218
La. 1981
2221, 2225 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977)
-
State v. Knowles
392 So. 2d 651
La. 1980
This court has employed both the "Blockburger" test, see, for example, and the "same evidence" test.
- State v. Vincent 387 So. 2d 1097 La. 1980
- State v. Steele 387 So. 2d 1175 La. 1980