Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Roussel, 381 So. 2d 796.

41 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Christopher Gatson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana Versus Pedro Monterroso La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
State v. Cooper 223 So. 3d 573 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Augustine 133 So. 3d 148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Bazile 144 So. 3d 719 La. 2013
-800 (La.1980), in our discussion of the scope of a prosecutor’s obligation to disclose exculpatory evidence under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct.
State v. Howard 106 So. 3d 1038 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State v. Declouet 52 So. 3d 89 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
1487 , 67 L.Ed.2d 618 (1981); ).
State of Louisiana v. Mason N. Godfrey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Godfrey 4 So. 3d 265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Crawford 848 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
State v. Garrick 832 So. 2d 1110 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
State v. Kemp 828 So. 2d 540 La. 2002
State v. Hampton 750 So. 2d 867 La. 1999
State v. Corley 617 So. 2d 1292 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
State v. Bender 598 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
: "The purpose of the Brady rule is to insure that defendants receive their constitutional right to a fair trial guaranteed by the due process clause, a trial in which the trier of fact has before it all available material exculpatory evidence.
State v. Dozier 553 So. 2d 931 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Cormier 487 So. 2d 1237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
1487 , 67 L.Ed.2d 618 (1981)
State v. Williams 483 So. 2d 626 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
The failure of the State to disclose the fact of the ‘working’ lineup, although possibly improper, constituted harmless error.” : “We agree with the trial judge that it would have been preferable if the prosecution had disclosed the information at issue here prior to trial.
State v. London 478 So. 2d 1340 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Williams, supra
State v. Capano 466 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
(5th Cir.1983), (5th Cir.1984).
State v. Williams 448 So. 2d 659 La. 1984
State v. Humphrey 445 So. 2d 1155 La. 1984
at 798 (La.1980), we said: When the reliability of a witness may be determinative of guilt or innocence, evidence which impeaches the testimony of that witness may fall within the Brady rule that the state must disclose material exculpatory evidence.
State v. Lathers 444 So. 2d 96 La. 1983
State v. Ruiz 437 So. 2d 330 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. Willis 438 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Russell 434 So. 2d 460 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. Parish 429 So. 2d 442 La. 1983
State v. Vaughn 431 So. 2d 358 La. 1983
State v. Smith 430 So. 2d 31 La. 1983
State v. Napoli 428 So. 2d 957 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Telsee 425 So. 2d 1251 La. 1983
State v. Edwards 419 So. 2d 881 La. 1982
State v. Arnaud 412 So. 2d 1013 La. 1982
information favorable to the defendant was made known to him for the first time during trial.
State v. Reed 409 So. 2d 266 La. 1982
where this court rejected a contention that a twelve year sentence was excessive in a forcible rape case under the following facts.
State v. Naas 409 So. 2d 535 La. 1981
State v. Peters 406 So. 2d 189 La. 1981
763 , 31 L.Ed.2d 104 (1972)
State v. Davenport 399 So. 2d 201 La. 1981
763 , 31 L.Ed.2d 104 (1972)
State v. Hicks 395 So. 2d 790 La. 1981
State v. McMahon 391 So. 2d 1120 La. 1980
State v. Landry 388 So. 2d 699 La. 1980
763 , 31 L.Ed.2d 104 (1972)
State v. Curtis 384 So. 2d 396 La. 1980
763 , 31 L.Ed.2d 104 (1972); State v. Falkins, supra.