Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Killcrease, 379 So. 2d 737.

20 citing documents.

  • State Of Louisiana v. Alexis Michelle Zebley La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
  • State v. Loicana 254 So. 3d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    See State v. Killcrease , , 739 (La.
  • State v. Escoto 41 So. 3d 1160 La. 2010
    LaRue, 368 So.2d at 1051
  • State v. Griffin 984 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • State v. Robinson 743 So. 2d 814 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    : A valid inventory search is conducted not on probable cause to secure evidence, but merely to inventory the vehicle’s contents in order to safeguard them, as an incident to the vehicle’s necessarily being taken into lawful police custody.
  • State v. Daigle 610 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
  • State v. Tucker 591 So. 2d 1208 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Short 588 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    : A valid inventory search is conducted not on probable cause to secure evidence, but merely to inventory the vehicle’s contents in order to safeguard them, as an incident to the vehicle’s necessarily being taken into lawful police custody.
  • State v. Rack 585 So. 2d 1215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • State v. Washington 540 So. 2d 502 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Washington 540 So. 2d 502 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Knippers 535 So. 2d 403 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Harris 504 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    A brief written opinion was rendered soon thereafter in which the court ruled that the "inventory search" (La.
  • State v. Carey 499 So. 2d 283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Dorociak 493 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Moak 427 So. 2d 1233 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Osbon 426 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Sims 426 So. 2d 148 La. 1983
  • State v. Jernigan 390 So. 2d 1306 La. 1980
  • State v. Hardy 384 So. 2d 432 La. 1980
    Recently, we considered the purpose and justification for an inventory search and reiterated the rule that where the conduct of the police was inconsistent with their contention that the search was conducted for true inventory purposes, we have found the search to be unlawful.