Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite RG Claitor's Realty v. Juban, 391 So. 2d 394.

57 citing documents.

Joel Colby Stevens v. Hospital Service District Number 1 of Tangipahoa Parish La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
Issue Preclusion In R. G. Claitor' s ( La.
Superior Trucking, LLC v. Sasol Chemicals, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Mayehaul Trucking, LLC v. Sasol Chemicals LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Sheila Broussard Guidry v. Ave Maria Rosary & Cenacle, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Walter J. Horrell v. Jack Marks Alltmont La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
In R. G. Claitor' s ( La.
Sanctuary Capital, LLC on Behalf of North Louisiana Bidco, LLC v. Richard D. Cloud, James Randolph Garner, and … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
Llopis v. La. State Bd. of Dentistry 255 So. 3d 627 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
R. G. Claitor's Realty v. Juban , , 396 (La.
Quatrevingt v. State 242 So. 3d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Claitor's Realty v. Juban , (La.
Bryan v. Griggs 128 So. 3d 1255 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
Claitor’s Babineaux v. Pemie-Bailey Drilling Co., 261 La.
Succession of Schmolke 119 So. 3d 916 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
George Keith Day v. Superior Derrick Services La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Day v. Superior Derrick Services 80 So. 3d 654 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Donald Ray Brown v. Town of Ferriday La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Claitor’s ), writ denied, 02-2751 (La.
Brown v. Town of Ferriday 76 So. 3d 155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Claitor’s ), writ denied, 02-2751 (La.1/31/03), .
Gisclair v. Louisiana Tax Commission 44 So. 3d 272 La. 2010
McGregor v. HOSPICE CARE IN BATON ROUGE 36 So. 3d 272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Palmer v. Walker 31 So. 3d 443 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
*445 Claitor’s See also Pittman v. State Farm Mut.
Cotton v. DELTA QUEEN STEAMBOAT CO., INC. 36 So. 3d 262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Claitor’s the Louisiana Supreme Court reiterated that principle: Our jurisprudence has rested on a solid foundation the rule that all the issues presented by the pleadings, and on which evidence has been offered, will be considered as disposed of by a final | ¡judgment in the cause, and that demands passed over
Katner v. Katner 28 So. 3d 566 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Claitor’s the Louisiana Supreme Court reiterated that principle: Our jurisprudence has rested on a solid foundation the rule that all the issues presented by the pleadings, and on which evidence has been offered, will be considered as disposed of by a final judgment in the cause, and that demands passed over in
La. State Bar Ass'n v. CARR AND ASSOCIATES 15 So. 3d 158 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Howard v. Administrators of Tulane Ed. Fund 986 So. 2d 47 La. 2008
-99 (La.1980); [15] La.Code Civ.
Rainey v. Entergy Gulf States, Inc. 885 So. 2d 1193 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Quinette v. Delhommer, 247 La.
City of Eunice v. Credeur 828 So. 2d 710 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Sewell v. Argonaut Southwest Ins.
In Re Succession of Ewing 781 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Dumas v. Angus Chemical Co. 742 So. 2d 655 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Ortego v. STATE, DOTD 689 So. 2d 1358 La. 1997
Ebey v. Harvill 647 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Brown v. Drillers, Inc. 630 So. 2d 741 La. 1994
Sj v. Pm 586 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Landmark Savings Bank, S.S.B. v. Bott 583 So. 2d 586 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Professional Occupational Therapy Services, Inc. v. Vanco Human Services, Inc. 572 So. 2d 331 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Fleniken v. Allbritton 566 So. 2d 1106 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Lieber v. Ownership of Real Prop., Caddo Parish, (La.App.
Seybert v. Spurney 562 So. 2d 954 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Preis v. Standard Coffee Service Co. 545 So. 2d 1010 La. 1989
(on rehearing), a case involving a dispute over unobstructed access to a parcel of property.
Murphy v. Hoffpauir 540 So. 2d 573 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Lowe v. Prejean 540 So. 2d 436 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Allied Corp. v. McNamara 536 So. 2d 1290 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Claitor’s (on rehearing).
Preis v. Standard Coffee Service Co. 534 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Ward v. Pennington 523 So. 2d 1286 La. 1988
Ford v. State ex rel. DHHR 483 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Cooper v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co. 481 So. 2d 611 La. 1986
Fidelity & Dep. Co. of Md. v. Cloy Const. Co. 463 So. 2d 1365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
MUT. FIRE, MARINE & INLAND INS. v. Electro Corp. 461 So. 2d 410 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Adams v. STATE, DEPT. OF HEALTH & HUMAN RESOURCES 458 So. 2d 1295 La. 1984
DAUL INS. AGENCY, INC. v. Parish of Jefferson 447 So. 2d 1208 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
the proper translation of the phrase "cause of action" in LSA-C.C.
Zeringue v. Zeringue 442 So. 2d 1211 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
TERRA DEVEL. CORP. v. Southland Dragway, Inc. 442 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Building Engineering Services Co., Inc. v. State 441 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
the Supreme Court held that the term "the same cause of action" in Art. 2286 is a mistranslation; the Article should read "the same cause."
Jacoby v. State 434 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Moossy v. Huckabay Hospital, Inc.
Safeco Ins. Co. of America v. Palermo 436 So. 2d 536 La. 1983