Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. McIntyre, 381 So. 2d 408.
- State v. Casimier 454 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
- State v. Williams 447 So. 2d 495 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
- State v. Peterson 446 So. 2d 815 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
- State v. Richardson 444 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Broadway 440 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
- State v. Gintz 438 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
- State v. Anderson 440 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
-
State v. Stovall
439 So. 2d 618
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
: *621 This court has repeatedly held that the trial court is vested with broad discretion in ruling on challenges for cause and that the trial court's ruling will be reversed only when it appears, upon review of the voir dire as a whole, that the court's exercise of its discretion has been arbitrary or
- State v. Foster 437 So. 2d 309 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
-
State v. Shapiro
431 So. 2d 372
La. 1983
1620 , 32 L.Ed.2d 152 (1972)
-
State v. White
430 So. 2d 174
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
cert denied 449 U.S. 871 , 101 S.Ct.
- State v. Smith 418 So. 2d 515 La. 1982
- State v. Ellwest Stereo Theatres, Inc. 412 So. 2d 594 La. 1982
-
State v. Chapman
410 So. 2d 689
La. 1982
: "This court has repeatedly held that the trial court is vested with broad discretion in ruling on challenges for cause and that the trial court's ruling will be reversed only when it appears, upon review of the voir dire as a whole, that the court's exercise of its discretion has been arbitrary or unre
- State v. Sugar 408 So. 2d 1329 La. 1982
- State v. Smith 398 So. 2d 1090 La. 1981
- State v. Spell 399 So. 2d 551 La. 1981
- State v. Bates 397 So. 2d 1331 La. 1981
- State v. Claiborne 397 So. 2d 486 La. 1981
- State v. Johnson 389 So. 2d 1302 La. 1980
- State v. Williams 385 So. 2d 214 La. 1980