Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Woodard, 387 So. 2d 1066.

24 citing documents.

Karen Cohen Kinnett Versus Jarred Brandon Kinnett La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
1187, 14 L.Ed.2d 62 (1965); (La.
State ex rel. M.K 261 So. 3d 955 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Stanfield 137 So. 3d 788 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Arita 900 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Durden 842 So. 2d 1244 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
1980); cf. Tyler v. Phelps, 643 F.2d 1095 (5th Cir.1981).
Williams v. Louisiana State University Medical Center 792 So. 2d 846 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Peterson 696 So. 2d 211 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Succession of Haydel 685 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
ted States Supreme Court held: [Pjrior to an action which will affect an interest in life, liberty, or property protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, a State must provide “notice reasonably calculated, under all the circumstances, to apprise interested parties of the pendency of the action and afford them an opportunity to present their objections.” the Louisiana Supreme Court recognized that procedural due process under the Louisiana Constitution encompasses prior not
State in Interest of AC 643 So. 2d 719 La. 1994
Martin v. Rush's Fabricare Center, Inc. 590 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Lee 577 So. 2d 1193 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
In State v. Nicholas, supra, both pre-code cases, the Louisiana Supreme Court held fingerprints on file with a police agency fell within the public documents exception to the hearsay rule.
In Re Adoption of BGS 556 So. 2d 545 La. 1990
1187 , 14 L.Ed.2d 62 (1965)
State v. Payne 540 So. 2d 520 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Burch 490 So. 2d 552 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Walker 489 So. 2d 353 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. McCullom 480 So. 2d 430 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Mitchell v. State, Department of Public Safety, License Control & Driver Improvement Division 476 So. 2d 922 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Page, supra; writ denied, writ denied
Hall v. State ex rel. Department of Public Safety, Office of Motor Vehicles, Driver Management Bureau 474 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Tharpe 459 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
the Court declined to address the defendant's complaint that he was unrepresented by counsel at a previous guilty plea because the record did not factually support his claim.
State v. Vigers 441 So. 2d 835 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Clayton 427 So. 2d 827 La. 1983
art. 841; cf. Tyler v. Phelps, 643 F.2d 1095 (5th Cir.1981).
State v. West 419 So. 2d 868 La. 1982
State v. Wright 410 So. 2d 1092 La. 1982
State v. Jones 404 So. 2d 1192 La. 1981
[1] (decided on other grounds); (question avoided for lack of an apt objection); (Dixon, C. J., concurring) (expresses opinion Boykin and Lewis should be applied to violations of La.R.S.