DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Landry, 381 So. 2d 462.

50 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Lisa W. Rabalais La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
    2419, 77 L.Ed.2d 1309 (1983)
  • State ex rel. C.M. 128 So. 3d 1118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    in support of his position that his conduct constituted justifiable self-defense.
  • State v. Banks 128 So. 3d 534 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Boudreaux 48 So. 3d 1144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Some three years earlier, the Louisiana Supreme Court (without even questioning whether the burden in a non-homicide case was on the defendant to establish that he acted in self-defense or on the State to prove that the defendant did not act in self-defense), reversed a defendant’s conviction for aggravated assault, finding that he
  • State v. Collins 826 So. 2d 598 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Smith 697 So. 2d 39 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    14:76, is an affirmative defense and must be proven by a preponderance of the evidence, (La.
  • State v. Carter 684 So. 2d 432 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • State v. Golson 658 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • State v. Turner 626 So. 2d 890 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
  • State v. Sparrow 612 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
  • State v. Braswell 605 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
    14:19; writ denied (1985).
  • State v. Lewis 578 So. 2d 253 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • State v. Kidd 568 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
  • State v. Lewis 560 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
  • State ex rel. D.W. 528 So. 2d 1071 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    ight of self-defense unless he withdraws from the conflict in good faith and in such a manner that his adversary knows or should know that he desires to withdraw and discontinue the conflict.” An affirmative defense in a criminal matter “need be established only by a preponderance of evidence, not beyond a reasonable doubt as is incumbent on the state to prove defendant’s guilt.”
  • State v. Mussall 523 So. 2d 1305 La. 1988
    2419 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1309 (1983); (La.
  • State v. Agnelly 515 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
    State v. Landry, supra [ ]; State v. Guinn, supra [ ].
  • State v. Mason 499 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    State v. Landry, [ ] supra; (La.
  • State v. Navarre 498 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Barnes 491 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Barnes 489 So. 2d 402 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Simpson 464 So. 2d 1104 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Jones 462 So. 2d 1373 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    our Supreme Court recognized a defendant’s entitlement to the production of favorable evidence under United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97 , 96 S.Ct.
  • State v. Cook 460 So. 2d 1075 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    which held that in a nonhomicide case the affirmative defense of self defense need be established only by a preponderance of the evidence, not beyond a reasonable doubt as is incumbent upon the state to prove defendant's guilt.
  • State v. Cheatwood 458 So. 2d 907 La. 1984
  • State v. Carry 459 So. 2d 676 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Williams 458 So. 2d 1315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Ducote 452 So. 2d 1305 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
    The defense of justification requires evidence on two points, at p. 467: "Justification requires a dual inquiry.
  • State v. Scott 451 So. 2d 1135 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 ] (1979); ” Here, the trial judge obviously felt that the adduced proof, which included some direct evidence along with the circumstantial evidence establishing Scott’s general criminal intent, was sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the necessary elements of the crime
  • State v. Walker 432 So. 2d 1057 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Coleman 432 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Freeman 427 So. 2d 1161 La. 1983
    which held that in a non-homicide case the affirmative defense of self-defense need be established "only by a preponderance of evidence, not beyond a reasonable doubt as is incumbent on the state to prove defendant's guilt."
  • State v. Richardson 425 So. 2d 1228 La. 1983
  • State v. Johnson 426 So. 2d 95 La. 1983
  • State v. Ray 423 So. 2d 1116 La. 1982
    State v. Statum, supra ; State v. Strickland, supra, at 1068 (Calogero, J. concurring).
  • State v. Cobb 419 So. 2d 1237 La. 1982
  • State v. Ates 418 So. 2d 1326 La. 1982
  • Landry v. Ascension Parish School Bd. 415 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
  • State in Interest of Pigott 413 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
  • State v. Arnaud 412 So. 2d 1013 La. 1982
  • State in Interest of White 411 So. 2d 537 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
  • State v. Goiner 410 So. 2d 1085 La. 1982
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Smith 407 So. 2d 652 La. 1981
    But the Supreme Court has established a : " Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Lemoine 403 So. 2d 1230 La. 1981
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Hogan 403 So. 2d 1210 La. 1981
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979) defendant claims the due process clause of the United States Constitution mandates reversal of a conviction when the proof of guilt is such that no rational trier of fact could find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State v. Stewart 400 So. 2d 633 La. 1981
  • State v. LaFleur 398 So. 2d 1074 La. 1981
  • State v. Moody 393 So. 2d 1212 La. 1981
  • State Ex Rel. Womack v. Blackburn 393 So. 2d 1216 La. 1981
  • State v. White 389 So. 2d 1300 La. 1980