Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite City of Baton Rouge v. Bourgeois, 380 So. 2d 63.

16 citing documents.

State v. Sims 33 So. 3d 340 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Hicks 30 So. 3d 1081 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Robinson 19 So. 3d 1206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Watkins 972 So. 2d 381 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
That notation obviously was made in Howard simply as an aside to Stewart, where this court stated that the fact that the sentences in that case were mandatory life sentences distinguished the case from two decisions cited by the defendant, (La.App.
State v. Howard 805 So. 2d 1247 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Bass 767 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
However, in each of these cases, the delay in sentencing was either due to court error, in that the court forgot to sentence the defendant ( (La.App.
State v. Hancock 748 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Stewart 732 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
a defendant, who pleaded guilty to driving while intoxicated was sentenced four years later to serve thirty days; the sentence was suspended, and he was placed on one year's unsupervised probation.
State v. Christmann 692 So. 2d 1155 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
State v. Williams 681 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Dorsey 672 So. 2d 188 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. McCoy 586 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
City of Winnfield v. Weems 545 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Milson 458 So. 2d 1037 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Schaeffer 414 So. 2d 730 La. 1982
we held that the trial judge did not comply with Art. 894.1 by merely noting that he had considered the information provided in the presentence investigation report.
State v. Duncan 396 So. 2d 297 La. 1981
and State v. Johnson , above, dealing with this court's approach to "unreasonable delay" in sentencing.