Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Jackson, 381 So. 2d 485.

84 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Dewayne Fitzgerald Poullard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated the principles under which the admissibility of a confession must be judged.
  • State of Louisiana v. William G Perkins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
    –87 (La.1980) (alteration in original) (footnote omitted).
  • State of Louisiana v. Terry Len Joseph La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
  • State v. Scarborough 256 So. 3d 265 La. 2018
    State v. Jackson , , 488 (La.
  • STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS RAY DELOACH AKA RAY A. DELOACH La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated the principles under which the admissibility of a confession must be judged.
  • State of Louisiana v. Debra Sue Schjenken AKA Debra Sue Hewitt AKA Debra Odir La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    2d Cir.1992), citing State v. Jackson, [] supra.
  • State of Louisiana v. Brady J. Harrington La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated the principles under which the admissibility of a confession must be judged.
  • State v. Harrington 129 So. 3d 38 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated the principles under which the admissibility of a confession must be judged.
  • State of Louisiana v. Rasheed Ali Sterling La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated the principles under which the admissibility of a confession must be judged.
  • State of Louisiana v. Aaron W. Ardoin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • State v. Ardoin 58 So. 3d 1025 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State of Louisiana v. Jonathan Edward Boyer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated the principles under which the admissibility of a confession must be judged.
  • State v. Boyer 56 So. 3d 1119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated the principles under which the admissibility of a confession must be judged.
  • State v. Anderson 996 So. 2d 973 La. 2008
  • State v. Brown 965 So. 2d 580 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated the principles under which the admissibility of a confession must be judged.
  • State v. Allen 942 So. 2d 1244 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    State v. Roddy, the supreme court stated the principles under which the admissibility of a confession must be judged.
  • State v. Wilson 938 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Robertson 927 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    the supreme court stated the principles under which the admissibility of a confession must be judged.
  • State v. Roshell 916 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated the principles under which the admissibility of a confession must be judged.
  • State v. Johnson 917 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
  • State v. Williams 918 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    [10] State v. McLelland, supra .
  • State v. Demming 911 So. 2d 894 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Bowers 909 So. 2d 1038 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated the principles under which the admissibility of a confession must be judged.
  • State v. Brown 907 So. 2d 1 La. 2005
    In the instant case, the trial court held a hearing on June 13, 2000 on defendant's motion to suppress his statements.
  • State v. Maten 899 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
  • State v. McGee 894 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    State v. McLelland, supra .
  • State v. Morris 882 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Weaver 873 So. 2d 909 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    P. art. 703(D); State v. Roddy, (La.App.2d Cir.4/7/00), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.5/11/01), .
  • State v. Turner 859 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated the principles under which the admissibility of a confession must be judged.
  • State v. McLelland 860 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    State v. Holloway, 37,021, p. 10 (La.App.
  • State v. George 855 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    568 (1897); State v. Roddy, supra .
  • State v. Trotter 852 So. 2d 1247 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated the principles under which the admissibility of a confession must be judged.
  • State v. Murray 827 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Nightengale 818 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated the principles under which the admissibility of a confession must be judged.
  • State v. Franklin 803 So. 2d 1057 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated the principles under which the admissibility of a confession must be judged.
  • State v. Jeselink 799 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    the Louisiana supreme court stated the principles under which the admissibility of a confession must be judged.
  • State v. McNeal 785 So. 2d 957 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673 (La.9/8/99), , cert.
  • State v. Richardson 779 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673 (La.9/08/99), , cert.
  • State v. Roddy 756 So. 2d 1272 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
  • State v. Coleman 756 So. 2d 1218 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
  • State v. Lucky 755 So. 2d 845 La. 1999
  • State v. Thibodeaux 750 So. 2d 916 La. 1999
  • State v. Chester 724 So. 2d 1276 La. 1999
  • State v. Shelvin 720 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
  • State v. Gaspard 709 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
  • State v. McCartney 684 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    the court noted that as a matter of federal constitutional law, a confession obtained by "any direct or implied promises, however slight, [or] by the exertion of improper influence" must be considered involuntary and inadmissible.
  • State v. Gaspard 685 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Davis 637 So. 2d 1012 La. 1994
  • State v. Hongo 625 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
  • State v. Clay 623 So. 2d 211 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated the principles under which the admissibility of a confession must be judged.