Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Ortego, 382 So. 2d 921.

157 citing documents.

  • State v. Scott 593 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
  • State v. Conway 588 So. 2d 1369 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Lamark 584 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • State v. Thomas 556 So. 2d 1349 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    ’ See also State v. Allen, supra.” Here, at the conclusion of the sentencing hearing the trial judge commented as follows: “Hubert Thomas, entered a plea of guilty to the charge of simple rape and the charge of molestation of a juvenile.
  • State v. Smith 557 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • State v. Ritchie 556 So. 2d 651 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
    All factors are to be considered, cert.
  • State v. Johnson 553 So. 2d 953 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Jackson 552 So. 2d 445 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
  • State v. Dewhirst 551 So. 2d 70 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    ” See also State v. Allen, supra.
  • State v. Crocker 551 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Washington 550 So. 2d 287 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Olive 544 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Ferguson 540 So. 2d 1116 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Reed 536 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
  • State v. Phelps 520 So. 2d 1299 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
  • State v. Smith 520 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
  • State v. Lighten 516 So. 2d 1266 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    cert den., 449 U.S. 848 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Lynch 512 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Duvio 511 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
    State v. Williams, supra ; cert.
  • State v. Mills 505 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Rochefort 504 So. 2d 1116 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Parker 503 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Williams 499 So. 2d 142 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Davis 496 So. 2d 1197 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Jacobs 493 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Gaudin 493 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
    State v. Williams, supra; cert.
  • State v. Dawson 490 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Norman 482 So. 2d 1069 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Doolittle 482 So. 2d 896 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Hamilton 481 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Tomlin 478 So. 2d 622 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    cert.denied 449 U.S. 848 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Camps 476 So. 2d 864 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    in which the court observed that "based on the American theory and practice, concurrent rather than consecutive sentences are the usual rule, at least for a defendant without previous record and in the absence of a showing that the public safety requires a longer sentence."
  • State v. Pruitt 474 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Pruitt 474 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Atley 470 So. 2d 621 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Torres 470 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Coleman 469 So. 2d 1069 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Ashley 463 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Pelt 448 So. 2d 1294 La. 1984
  • State v. Westfall 446 So. 2d 1292 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Lewis 445 So. 2d 195 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Williams 445 So. 2d 1264 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Williams 445 So. 2d 1171 La. 1984
  • State v. Littleton 436 So. 2d 500 La. 1983
  • State v. Webster 427 So. 2d 1324 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    While the Supreme Court has recognized that concurrent rather than consecutive sentences are the general rule for convictions arising out of a single course of criminal conduct and in the absence of a showing that the public safety requires a longer sentence [ State v. Cox, supra.], it has never been held that if convictions arise out of a single course of conduct that consecutive sentences will necessarily be found to be excessive.
  • Fontana v. Fontana 426 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    Art. 883 are not applicable.
  • State v. Barrios 425 So. 2d 980 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
  • State v. Jett 419 So. 2d 844 La. 1982
  • State v. Walker 416 So. 2d 534 La. 1982
  • State v. Lodrige 414 So. 2d 759 La. 1982