Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Ragsdale, 381 So. 2d 492.

43 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana in the Interest of T.B., Jr. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
2d 576 ( 1967) ( Harlan, J. concurring); ( La.
State of Louisiana v. Woodrow Johnson La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
See Perry, 502 So.2d at 558 (La.
State v. Cox 272 So. 3d 597 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
The defendant relies on the case of State v. Ragsdale , (La.
State v. Isaac 229 So. 3d 1030 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Joseph Michael Moultrie 224 So. 3d 349 La. 2017
Perry, 502 So.2d at 558; (La.
State v. Savage 218 So. 3d 714 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Moultrie 182 So. 3d 1017 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Green 164 So. 3d 331 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Pounds 166 So. 3d 1037 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
507, 516 , 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967) (Harlan, J. concurring)
Shane v. Parish of Jefferson 150 So. 3d 406 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
(); Angelo Iajrate Const., L.L.C., 879 So.2d at 255 .
State v. Leblanc 137 So. 3d 656 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Kevin W. Jones, Sr. v. Town of Woodworth La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Jones v. Town of Woodworth 132 So. 3d 422 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Bone 107 So. 3d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Dowdell 99 So. 3d 1015 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Wilson 56 So. 3d 375 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Jackson 42 So. 3d 368 La. 2010
Perry, 502 So.2d at 558 ; (“The test for determining whether one has a reasonable expectation of privacy is not only whether the person had an actual or subjective |7expectation of privacy, but also whether that expectation is of a type which society at large is prepared to recognize as being reasonable.”).
State v. Carter 38 So. 3d 1092 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Skinner 10 So. 3d 1212 La. 2009
507, 516 , 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967) (Harlan, J. concurring)
State v. Fournette 989 So. 2d 199 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
State v. James 980 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Copeland v. Copeland 966 So. 2d 1040 La. 2007
Id., (); Hilbun v. State ex rel.
State v. Brumfield 944 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
State v. Hamilton 770 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Hilbun v. State ex rel. Division of Administration 745 So. 2d 1189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Capital City Press v. East Baton Rouge Parish Metropolitan Council, 96-1979 (La.7/1/97)
Capital City Press v. Metro. Council 696 So. 2d 562 La. 1997
State v. *567 Ragsdale, State v. Harper, 27-278 (La.App.2d Cir. 8/23/95), , writ denied, 95-2318 (La.1/12/96), .
State v. O'Shea 696 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
They further assert that the subsequent consent to search was invalid, not only because of the coercive circumstances, but because the initial entry was illegal, as in State v. Ferrand, 95-1346 (La.12/8/95), .
State v. Smith 680 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Stacy 665 So. 2d 390 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
State v. Harper 660 So. 2d 537 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
State v. McKinney 637 So. 2d 1120 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Karston 588 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
the Louisiana Supreme Court noted "the test for determining whether one has a reasonable expectation of privacy is not only whether the person has a reasonable or subjective expectation of privacy, but also whether that expectation is of a type which society at large is prepared to recognize as being r
State v. Cathey 493 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
In support of this contention
State v. Havard 469 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State *1204 v. Ragsdale, State v. Wolfe, supra.
State v. Hussey 469 So. 2d 346 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Rios v. U.S., 364 U.S. 253 , 80 S.Ct.
State v. Taylor 468 So. 2d 617 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
2254 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975); State v. Owen, supra; (on rehearing); State v. Summers, supra.
State v. Owen 453 So. 2d 1202 La. 1984
Distinguished State v. Summers 440 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. Mitchell, supra.
State v. Cormier 438 So. 2d 1269 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. LeCompte 441 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
State v. Pittman 397 So. 2d 1297 La. 1981
State v. Haynie 395 So. 2d 669 La. 1981
this court held that, without reasonable belief that defendant could be found in the third party's home as required by La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Brown 395 So. 2d 1301 La. 1981
at 497 (La.1980): *1311 "The test for determining whether one has a reasonable expectation of privacy is not only whether the person had an actual or subjective expectation of privacy, but also whether that expectation is of a type which society at large is prepared to recognize as being reasonable.