Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Patrick, 381 So. 2d 501.

15 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Marcus Jackson La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
  • State of Louisiana v. Keith C. Kisack 236 So. 3d 1201 La. 2017
  • State v. Draughter 130 So. 3d 855 La. 2013
    (prisoners are not totally bereft of Fourth Amendment rights by virtue of their incarceration, but those rights are diminished in nature and scope due to their confinement for criminal conduct); see also Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517, 523 , 104 S.Ct.
  • State of Louisiana v. Cedric Charles Edwards AKA Cederic C. Edwards La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    we noted that warrantless searches of a parolee‟s person and residence by a parole officer have been upheld where the search was reasonable, even though less than probable cause was shown, citing cases from the United States Courts of Appeals for the Second and Ninth Circuits: United
  • State v. Edwards 107 So. 3d 883 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    we noted that war-rantless searches of a parolee’s person and residence by a parole officer have been upheld where the search was reasonable, even though less than probable cause was shown, citing cases from the United States Courts of Appeals for the Second and Ninth Circuits: United States ex rel.
  • State v. Jason 53 So. 3d 508 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. Drane 828 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Maise 805 So. 2d 1141 La. 2002
    we found that a parole officer's warrantless search of a parolee's person and residence was reasonable, even though less than probable cause was shown.
  • Fulford v. Regel 582 So. 2d 981 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    1861, 1877-78 , 60 L.Ed.2d 447 (1979)
  • State v. Epperson 576 So. 2d 96 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
    for authority that a parolee has a far greater expectation of privacy *99 than does a work release inmate.
  • State v. Guirlando 509 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    1 the Louisiana Supreme Court noted: While we have recognized that prisoners are not totally bereft of Fourth Amendment rights by virtue of their incarceration, we have also declared these *174 rights are diminished in nature and scope because of confinement for criminal conduct.
  • State v. Williams 490 So. 2d 255 La. 1986
  • State v. Carter 485 So. 2d 260 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    Thus, recognized that warrantless searches of a parolee's person and residence by a parole officer may be upheld as reasonable, although less than probable cause was shown.
  • State v. Malone 403 So. 2d 1234 La. 1981
    we noted that warrantless searches of a parolee's person and residence by a parole officer have been upheld where the search was reasonable, even though less than probable cause was shown, citing cases from the United States Courts of Appeals for the Second and Ninth Circuits: United States ex rel.
  • State v. McPhate 393 So. 2d 718 La. 1981
    this court held as follows: "While we have recognized that prisoners are not totally bereft of Fourth Amendment rights by virtue of their incarceration, we have also declared these rights are diminished in nature and scope because of confinement for criminal conduct.