Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Holmes, 388 So. 2d 722.

151 citing documents.

State v. Williams 893 So. 2d 7 La. 2004
State v. Kennedy, 00-1554 (La.4/3/01)
State v. Foy 853 So. 2d 689 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
We find the state’s (La.App.
State v. Tate 851 So. 2d 921 La. 2003
See State v. Anthony, 98-0406, pp. 11-14 (La.4/11/00), -86 ; -18 (La.1987)
State v. Wright 834 So. 2d 974 La. 2002
See e.g., State v. Brooks, supra (defendant facilitated rape and murder by holding victim while co-defendant undressed him, defendant also gagged boy and took him to the murder site, defendant's "presence and assistance" allowed jurors to conclude he acquiesced in the use of deadly force); (defendant convicted of first degree murder committed during armed robbery when accomplice shot victim because evidence showed defendant helped plan robbery, obtained shotgun, disarmed security guard, and thre
State v. Gilliam 827 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Bridgewater 823 So. 2d 877 La. 2002
State v. Pierre, 93-0893 at p. 4 (La.2/3/94), ; -27 (La.1980)(reasoning that "[p]roof of one person's intent is not proof of another's" and thus that to find non-shooter liable state was require to establish "the circumstances indicated that [non-shooter] also actively desired the death of or great bodily harm to the victim").
State v. Tolliver 818 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Johnson 803 So. 2d 358 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
(La.1980); State v. Pierre, 93-0893 (La.2/3/94), .
State v. Neal 796 So. 2d 649 La. 2001
State v. Arnold 801 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
State v. Kennedy 803 So. 2d 916 La. 2001
State v. Guss 775 So. 2d 622 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Mitchell 772 So. 2d 78 La. 2000
State v. Palermo 765 So. 2d 1155 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Pierre, 93-0893, p. 4, ( (La.
State v. Haynes 762 So. 2d 1247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Pierre, 93-0893, p. 4 (La.2/3/94)
State v. Mims 769 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
Gibson v. State 758 So. 2d 782 La. 2000
854 , 43 L.Ed.2d 54 (1975); , *791 820 (La.App.
State v. Hoffman 768 So. 2d 542 La. 2000
State v. Anthony 776 So. 2d 376 La. 2000
-718 (La.1987); -726 (La.1980); La.Rev.Stat.
State v. Thompson 758 So. 2d 972 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Webb 750 So. 2d 479 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Hall 750 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Mitchell 745 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Pierre, 93-0893, p. 4 (La.2/3/94)
State v. Hampton 750 So. 2d 867 La. 1999
State v. Howard 751 So. 2d 783 La. 1999
1984); , *798 681 (La.1982)
State v. Meads 734 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Hopson 735 So. 2d 81 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Smith 717 So. 2d 1209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
337 , 98 L.Ed.2d 363 (1987)
State v. Ortiz 701 So. 2d 922 La. 1997
State v. Graves 699 So. 2d 903 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
State v. Koon 704 So. 2d 756 La. 1997
ent cured by requested admonition); -725 (La.1982) (prosecutor's erroneous statement of law on intent at voir dire cured by requested admonition and correct instruction); -703 (La.1981) (prosecutor's erroneous statement of the law on intent at closing argument cured by requested admonition and correct charge); (district attorney misstated at voire dire the law on intent and the law of principals, error cured by trial court's jury instructions); (prosecutor misstated the law on intoxication and i
State v. Hart 691 So. 2d 651 La. 1997
(per curiam) ( State v. Shilow, 252 La.
State v. Hebert 688 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Smith 687 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Meyers 683 So. 2d 1378 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
State v. Foret 685 So. 2d 210 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Distinguished State v. Jasper 677 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Tart 672 So. 2d 116 La. 1996
State v. Bordenave 678 So. 2d 19 La. 1996
Cf., -19 (La.1987); -28 (La.1980)
State v. Wiley 672 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Moreover, ‘an individual may only be convicted as a principal for those crimes for which he personally has the requisite mental state.’ ”
State v. Bordenave 660 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
State v. Marshall 657 So. 2d 1106 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
State v. Girod 653 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
State v. Domangue 649 So. 2d 1034 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Howard 638 So. 2d 216 La. 1994
State v. Doucet 638 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
State v. Pierre 631 So. 2d 427 La. 1994
State v. Monroe 626 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Cavazos 610 So. 2d 127 La. 1992
State v. Shilow, 252 La.
State v. Washington 597 So. 2d 1084 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Art. 807; State v. Christopher, supra.