Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Napier, 385 So. 2d 776.
- State of Louisiana v. Easton Joseph Francisco La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
- State v. Francisco 101 So. 3d 617 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
-
State v. Baxley
656 So. 2d 973
La. 1995
(looking to "severity of the crime" and "the probability of harm to its victims" in determining whether sentence unconstitutionally excessive).
- State v. Green 655 So. 2d 272 La. 1995
- State v. Green 655 So. 2d 252 La. 1995
- State v. Robinson 628 So. 2d 1342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
-
State v. Parker
594 So. 2d 3
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Napier, [ ], supra.
-
State v. Vinet
529 So. 2d 1334
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
See State v. Dison, supra , State v. Jackson, 381 So.
- State v. Nowacki 498 So. 2d 1203 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
- State v. Burge 493 So. 2d 1204 La. 1986
- State v. Cotten 438 So. 2d 1156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
-
State v. Guajardo
428 So. 2d 468
La. 1983
This section permits us to determine both whether the range of sentences authorized by a criminal statute is excessive, and whether the sentence of the particular offender is excessive, though within the statutorily prescribed range.
- State v. David 425 So. 2d 1241 La. 1983
-
State v. Vaccaro
411 So. 2d 415
La. 1982
See State v. Dison, supra , (La.