Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Goode, 380 So. 2d 1361.

85 citing documents.

State v. Johnson 207 So. 3d 1101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Toby James Fruge 179 So. 3d 579 La. 2015
State v. Cleveland 115 So. 3d 578 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Sanchez 39 So. 3d 834 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
The Louisiana Supreme Court has stated “[t]he deliberate inclusion by the redactors of the Constitution of a prohibition against ‘excessive’ as well as cruel and unusual punishment broadened the duty of this court to review the sentencing aspects of criminal statutes.”
State v. Allen 876 So. 2d 122 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
In State v. Baxley, 94-2982, p. 4 (La.5/22/95), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that the deliberate inclusion of the prohibition against excessive sentences in the state constitution by its redactors imposed on the court the duty to review the sentencing provisions of criminal statutes.
State v. Armour 874 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
the Louisiana Supreme Court articulated two reasons for finding La.
State v. Suire 827 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
2861 , 53 L.Ed.2d 982 (1977)], and State v. Goode, supra [ ].
State v. Fleury 799 So. 2d 468 La. 2001
State v. Stephenson 766 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Smith 766 So. 2d 501 La. 2000
State v. Baxley, 656 So.2d at 977
State v. Collins 734 So. 2d 723 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
“[I]n determining what is excessive punishment both under the federal and our state constitutions the harshness of the penalty must be compared with the severity of the offense.” (La.
State v. Baxley 656 So. 2d 973 La. 1995
State v. Walker 637 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. Hood 584 So. 2d 1238 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Defendants argue that the instant case is "on all fours"
State v. Munoz 575 So. 2d 848 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
State v. Tzuanos, supra at 828 .
State v. Welch 550 So. 2d 265 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Martin 520 So. 2d 1079 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Vital 505 So. 2d 1006 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Darby 502 So. 2d 274 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Goode, [ ] supra.
State v. Broussard 498 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Mitchell 498 So. 2d 1190 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
State v. Jardell 497 So. 2d 40 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Victorian 495 So. 2d 362 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Dew 495 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Stewart 492 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Colter 491 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Tzuanos 491 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
State v. Guidry 490 So. 2d 824 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Barnes 491 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
State v. Goode, [ ] supra.
State v. Thrasher 480 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Barberousse 480 So. 2d 273 La. 1985
State v. Harris 480 So. 2d 281 La. 1985
State v. Hogan 480 So. 2d 288 La. 1985
State v. Allen 478 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Collatt 477 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Camps 476 So. 2d 864 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
in which a motion to quash was sustained and the penalty provisions of a criminal statute declared unconstitutional where the mandatory nature of the penalty could result in a sentence which was disproportionate to the severity of a particular crime.
State v. Freeman 474 So. 2d 1035 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Telsee, supra; "
State v. Meshell 473 So. 2d 935 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Sepulvado 473 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Telsee, supra; ”
State v. Marks 472 So. 2d 601 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Lincoln 471 So. 2d 1194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Clark 467 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Williams 467 So. 2d 1293 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
State v. Edwards 467 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
: [T]he United States Supreme Court in recent years has adopted a standard that a sentence is excessive when it is grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime.
State v. Hayes 466 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
A sentence which appears to be severe is considered excessive and unconstitutional if it is “grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime” or “is nothing more than the purposeless and needless imposition of pain and suffering.”
State v. Simpson 464 So. 2d 1104 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Santee 464 So. 2d 922 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
State v. See 462 So. 2d 1369 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Hudson 463 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Kennedy 463 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
in which the Supreme Court held that the application of LSA-R.S.