Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Martin, 382 So. 2d 933.

54 citing documents.

State v. Fletcher 238 So. 3d 1007 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Mr. Fletcher takes the position that the Williams case "is no longer law," citing State v. Martin , (La.
State v. Jenkins 91 So. 3d 1075 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
He argues the advice of the privilege against self-incrimination given in connection with predicate # 1
State of Louisiana v. Darrell James Fontenot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
(purpose underlying the Boykin and Jackson rules “is to ensure the defendant’s receipt of adequate information, so that his decision to plead guilty is truly intelligent and voluntary....
Distinguished State v. Farinas 28 So. 3d 1132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
_[xgThe defendant relies on a case that predated Nuccio and is distinguishable— (La.
State of Louisiana v. Dominique J. Casson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
(purpose underlying the Boykin and Jackson rules “is to ensure the defendant’s receipt of adequate information, so that his decision to plead guilty is truly intelligent and voluntary.
State v. Casson 2 So. 3d 1246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
(purpose underlying the Boykin and Jackson rules “is to ensure the defendant’s receipt of adequate information, so that his decision to plead guilty is truly intelligent and voluntary.
State v. Smallwood 955 So. 2d 1264 La. 2007
(purpose underlying the Boykin and Jackson rules "is to ensure the defendant's receipt of adequate information, so that his decision to plead guilty is truly intelligent and voluntary.
State v. Ford 957 So. 2d 311 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
(purpose underlying the Boykin and [State ex rel.]
State v. Honeycutt 953 So. 2d 914 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
2d Cir.03/01/00), -398 , this court discussed the case law history on how the failure to specifically state that the Boykin rights apply to trial does not automatically invalidate the prior offense: (La.
State v. Mendenhall 944 So. 2d 560 La. 2006
(purpose underlying the Boykin and Jackson rules "is to ensure the defendant's receipt of adequate information, so that his decision to plead guilty is truly intelligent and voluntary.
State v. Zachary 829 So. 2d 405 La. 2002
("The record of the guilty plea proceeding shows that Martin waived his right to remain silent at that proceeding, but it does not show an intention to waive his right not to testify against himself at a trial."), overruled on other grounds
State v. Foy 808 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Stewart 754 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
2 the supreme court pointed out *398 3 , in which the failure of the trial court to specifically state that the Boykin trilogy of rights continues into trial, if so elected, invalidated the predicate offense.
State v. Gaar 746 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Lott 688 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
In support of his argument
State v. Klingman 594 So. 2d 510 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State ex rel. Whiticar v. Butler 576 So. 2d 515 La. 1991
An admission of guilt is not an essential prerequisite to a valid guilty plea in Louisiana, and neither counsel nor relator had acted improperly by participating in an otherwise knowing and voluntary guilty plea to an offense that relator maintained he did not commit.
State v. Hunt 573 So. 2d 585 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Richard 550 So. 2d 300 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Ross 542 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
1982) overruled on other grounds; in an attempt to distinguish his case from that of State v. Bowick, supra .
State v. Hensley 537 So. 2d 857 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
He claims a guilty plea is invalid if the court does not expressly tell the defendant that the privilege against-self-incrimination applies "at trial," citing three Louisiana cases (La.
State v. Pitre 506 So. 2d 930 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Distinguished State v. Ourso 502 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Brooks 501 So. 2d 812 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. McCarty 499 So. 2d 292 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Stansell 494 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Junegain 478 So. 2d 542 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
which requires the defendant be informed "of his right to stand trial without being forced to testify against himself.", a statement that was omitted in the Age form.
State v. Lawson 474 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
State v. Terrase 468 So. 2d 729 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
as support for his contention.
State v. Bailey 461 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Tuesno 455 So. 2d 1292 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Arrington 455 So. 2d 1284 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Wilson 454 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
decided without knowledge of United States v. Lewis, supra, held that a defect in the guilty plea to the predicate felony is a defense to a charge under LSA-R.S.
State v. Rivers 444 So. 2d 1384 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Sisk 444 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Murray 436 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
State v. Yarbrough 418 So. 2d 503 La. 1982
to support his contention the 1972 guilty plea was fatally defective because the defendant was not adequately advised of his privilege against self-incrimination.
State v. Age 417 So. 2d 1183 La. 1982
and recently reaffirmed in State v. Robicheaux & Powell, that an advisement of the privilege against self-incrimination in which the defendant was not told that the privilege applied at his trial was inadequate "because it failed to inform the defendant of his right to stand tr
State v. Robicheaux 412 So. 2d 1313 La. 1982
State v. Hayes 412 So. 2d 1323 La. 1982
State v. Lee 407 So. 2d 1192 La. 1981
State v. Washington 406 So. 2d 191 La. 1981
[1] this court emphasized that, "...
State v. Washington 406 So. 2d 191 La. 1981
1 this court emphasized that, “.
State v. McGinnis 413 So. 2d 1307 La. 1981
State v. Jones 404 So. 2d 1192 La. 1981
State v. Johnson 404 So. 2d 239 La. 1981
held that similar advice was insufficient since it did not adequately advise the defendant of his right to remain silent at a later trial after his plea.
State v. Halsell 403 So. 2d 688 La. 1981
State v. Cusher 400 So. 2d 601 La. 1981
State v. Warren 402 So. 2d 662 La. 1981
as interpreted by State v. Williams, supra.
State v. Williams 400 So. 2d 868 La. 1981
as interpreted by State v. Williams, supra.