Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Philippe v. Browning Arms Co., 395 So. 2d 310.
-
Shephard v. AIX Energy, Inc.
249 So. 3d 194
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
In Philippe v. Browning Arms Co. , (La.
- Ryan v. Case New Holland, Inc. 211 So. 3d 611 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
- Health Education & Welfare Federal Credit Union v. Peoples State Bank 83 So. 3d 1055 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
- Dixie Services v. R & B Falcon Drilling USA 955 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
- Peggy Landry and Dale Landry v. Forest River, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
- Landry v. Forest River, Inc. 953 So. 2d 1046 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
- Linoski v. FLEETWOOD HOMES OF TEXAS 873 So. 2d 886 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
- Dailey v. the Home Furnishings Store 857 So. 2d 1051 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
- Moreau v. NORTH AMERICAN FIRE AND CAS. INSURANCE COMPANY 806 So. 2d 809 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
- Domonter v. CF Bean Corp. 761 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
-
Morris v. United Services Auto. Ass'n
756 So. 2d 549
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
(on rehearing); Hostetler v. W. Gray & Co., Inc., supra .
-
Whitehead v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.
758 So. 2d 211
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
319 n. 12 (La.1980) (citing W. Prosser, Law of Torts § 65 at 422 (4th ed.1971)).
-
AL'S TRUCKING v. State Farm Fire & Cas.
735 So. 2d 833
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
The standard by which these steps are judged is that of a and Lawyers Title Ins.
-
Walton v. Cooper/T. Smith Stevedoring
709 So. 2d 941
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
In arguing that it is entitled to a reduction of the damage award, in which the Louisiana Supreme Court noted: The doctrine of avoidable consequences bars recovery of those damages which occurred after the initial injury and which might have been averted by reasonable conduct on the part of the plaintiff.
-
Guillory v. Ins. Co. of North America
692 So. 2d 1029
La. 1997
a dentist brought a products liability action against the manufacturer and importer of a shotgun which accidentally discharged and severed his right hand.
-
Trahan v. Savage Industries, Inc.
692 So. 2d 490
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Reeves v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., (La.App.
-
Dupree-Simpson Farms v. HELENA CHEMICAL
682 So. 2d 838
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
(on rehearing); Hostetler v. W. Gray & Co., Inc., supra .
- Hickman v. Exide, Inc. 679 So. 2d 527 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
-
Palomo v. LeBlanc Hyundai Partnership
665 So. 2d 414
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
Bourne v. Rein Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., (La.App.
-
Cobb v. Kleinpeter
663 So. 2d 236
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
at 318, n. 12 (La.1981) [1980]; see also Till v. Delta School of Commerce, Inc., (La.App.
-
Cobb v. Kleinpeter
663 So. 2d 236
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
at 318, n. 12 (La.1981) [1980]; see also Till v. Delta School of Commerce, Inc., (La.App.
-
Stapleton v. Great Lakes Chemical Corp.
639 So. 2d 300
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
-
Hines v. Remington Arms Co., Inc.
630 So. 2d 809
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
art. 2545 and its progeny.
- Cantrelle v. KIVA CONST. & ENGINEERING 630 So. 2d 265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
- Hoyt v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 623 So. 2d 651 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
- Berthelot v. Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co. 623 So. 2d 14 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
- Jessen v. Dr. Kenneth W. Wimberly, DDS 610 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
-
Bacle v. Wade
607 So. 2d 927
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Coco v. Winston Indus., supra
-
Bacle v. Wade
607 So. 2d 927
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Coco v. Winston Indus., supra
- O'BRIEN v. Remington Arms Co., Inc. 601 So. 2d 330 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
-
Young v. Ford Motor Co., Inc.
595 So. 2d 1123
La. 1992
For example, we held that "[t]he seller's (manufacturer's) act of delivering a defective thing, when he knows of the defect, gives rise to delictual, as well as contractual liability."
-
Buteau v. Leleux
591 So. 2d 1261
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
on rehearing, 395 So.2d at 314 (La.1981); (La.App.
- Thomas v. Petrolane Gas Service Ltd. 588 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
- Philippe v. Lloyd's Aero Boliviano 589 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
- Hale Farms, Inc. v. American Cyanamid Company 580 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
- Young v. FORD MOTOR CO., INC. 574 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
- Fernandez v. M/V RIO LIMAY 572 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
-
Johnston v. Norcondo
572 So. 2d 203
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
is to do a tortious act.") (La.
- Hobgood v. Aucoin 574 So. 2d 344 La. 1990
-
Cashio v. Kojis & Sons Signs
568 So. 2d 1388
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Plaintiff’s as supporting its position that a non-purchaser may recover attorney’s fees against a seller of a product is misplaced.
-
Burch v. Durham Pontiac Cadillac, Inc.
564 So. 2d 380
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
mandates judicial repudiation of the blanket exclusion of damages for inconvenience and mental anguish in redhibitory actions.
- Hobgood v. Aucoin 558 So. 2d 1285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
-
Soileau v. LaFosse
558 So. 2d 294
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
at 318, n. 12 (La.1981); see also Till v. Delta School of Commerce, Inc.
- Armstrong v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. 558 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
-
Hobgoob v. Aucoin
551 So. 2d 1306
La. 1989
The court of appeal is ordered to review the record and fix relator’s
-
Falgoust v. Richardson Industries, Inc.
552 So. 2d 1348
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
The general rule as to lost wages is that the trier of fact must consider all pertinent factors which bear on the probability of reduction of the particular plaintiff's earnings over his work-life expectancy
-
Vizinat v. Transcontinental Gas Pipeline
552 So. 2d 1237
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
The standard by which these steps are judged is that of a and Lawyers Title Ins.
- Risk v. State 549 So. 2d 1272 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
- Carter v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 548 So. 2d 53 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
-
Snoke v. M & M DODGE, INC.
546 So. 2d 936
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
3rd Cir.1986) and held that: "` Philippe v. Browning Arms Co., supra, in our opinion, is authority for the proposition that the purchaser who sustains damages because he or she purchased a redhibitorily defective product is entitled to be compensated for all provable damages, including inconvenience and mental anguish, if