Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Beavers, 382 So. 2d 943.

46 citing documents.

La. 2020
1980) (“To determine whether the penalty is grossly disproportionate to the crime we must consider the punishment and the crime in light of the harm to society caused by its commission and determine whether the penalty is so disproportionate to the crime committed as to shock our sense of justice.” ), (La.
State of Louisiana v. Deanna Gaspard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Gaspard 49 So. 3d 971 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Granger 982 So. 2d 779 La. 2008
2481 , 110 L.Ed.2d 412 (1990); see also State v. Rolen, 95-0347, p. 6 (La.9/15/95), (per curiam) (finding that the societal costs of impaired driving have been well documented); (upholding the constitutionality of harsher penalties for repeat D.W.I.
State v. Bajoie 899 So. 2d 78 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
State v. Landry, 2003-1671, pp. 7-9 (La.App.
State v. Day 838 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Rolen 662 So. 2d 446 La. 1995
2481, 2485 , 110 L.Ed.2d 412 (1990) ("[n]o one can seriously dispute the magnitude of the drunken driving problem or the States' interest in eradicating it"); (mandatory minimum sentence of 10 years at hard labor for a fourth offense D.W.I.
State v. Mims 566 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Lintzen 541 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Inabnet 512 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Vital 505 So. 2d 1006 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Darby 502 So. 2d 274 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Mims 501 So. 2d 962 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Jardell 497 So. 2d 40 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
“To determine whether the penalty is grossly disproportionate to the crime we must consider the punishment and the crime in light of the harm to society caused by its commission and determine whether the penalty is so disproportionate to the crime committed as to shock our sense of justice.” State v. Bonanno, supra
State v. Victorian 495 So. 2d 362 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
to the crime committed as to shock our sense of justice.” State v. Bonanno, supra
State v. Dew 495 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Colter 491 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Guidry 490 So. 2d 824 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
“To determine whether the penalty is grossly disproportionate to the crime we must consider the punishment and the crime in light of the harm to society caused by its commission and determine whether the penalty is so disproportionate to the crime committed as to shock our sense of justice.” State v. Bonanno, supra at 358
State v. Barnes 491 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
State v. Collatt 477 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Bonanno, supra; (La.App.
State v. Freeman 474 So. 2d 1035 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Telsee, supra; "
State v. Sepulvado 473 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Telsee, supra; ”
State v. Marks 472 So. 2d 601 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Babcock 461 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Stevens 461 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
“To determine whether the penalty is grossly disproportionate to the crime we must consider the punishment and the crime in light of the harm to society caused by its commission and determine whether the penalty is so disproportionate to the crime committed as to shock our sense of justice.” State v. Bonanno, supra
State v. Smith 457 So. 2d 1282 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Brown, supra; State v. Bonanno, supra
State v. Brogdon 457 So. 2d 616 La. 1984
State v. Foley 456 So. 2d 979 La. 1984
State v. Davis 449 So. 2d 452 La. 1984
State v. James 447 So. 2d 580 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Ratigan 446 So. 2d 525 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
n determining whether the penalty is grossly disproportionate to the offense, the appellate court must “consider the punishment and the crime in light of the harm to society caused by its commission and determine whether the penalty is so disproportionate to the crime committed as to shock our sense of justice.” State v. Pearson, supra
State v. Smith 445 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Bonanno, supra.
State v. Lathers 444 So. 2d 96 La. 1983
State v. Brown 438 So. 2d 1202 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Stone 438 So. 2d 1245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
’ “Additionally, in State v. Sepulvado, supra, we concluded that the statutory criteria legislatively provided by La.C.
State v. Remedies 438 So. 2d 1248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
*1251 ”’ Before imposing the concurrent nine year sentences the trial judge examined the pre-sentence investigation and Remedies’ rap sheet.
State v. Guidry 428 So. 2d 1292 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
’ “Additionally, in State v. Sepulvado, supra, we concluded that the statutory criteria legislatively provided by La.C.
State v. Telsee 425 So. 2d 1251 La. 1983
State v. Williams, supra ; (La.
State v. Robinson 423 So. 2d 1053 La. 1982
State v. Roussel 424 So. 2d 226 La. 1982
State v. Pearson 425 So. 2d 704 La. 1982
State v. Lodrige 414 So. 2d 759 La. 1982
State v. McDermitt 406 So. 2d 195 La. 1981
State v. Bonanno, supra; (La.
State v. Campbell 404 So. 2d 1205 La. 1981
State v. Napier 385 So. 2d 776 La. 1980
2681 , 53 L.Ed.2d 982 (1977); (La.
State v. Bonanno 384 So. 2d 355 La. 1980