Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Robinson, 387 So. 2d 1143.

47 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Carlos M. Smith La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
3d at 1286; see, Hardy v. United States, 375 U.S. 277, 280 n. 3, 84 S. Ct. 424, 427, 11 L. Ed. 2d 331 (1964); (La.
State Of Louisiana v. Andre D. Coleman La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Matthew L. Magrini La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
424, 11 L.Ed.2d 331 (1964); (La.
State v. Quinn 275 So. 3d 360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
424 , 11 L.Ed.2d 331 (1964) ; (La.
State v. Alridge 249 So. 3d 260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
99-0553, p. 20-21, 803 So.2d at 19-20 (citing State v. Robinson , (La.
State v. Handy 226 So. 3d 1182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
First, “[mjaterial omissions from the transcript of the proceedings at trial bearing on the merits of an appeal will require reversal.” id., 99-0553,p. 20-21 , 803 So.2d at 19 -20 ( .
State v. Jones 220 So. 3d 128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
First, “[m]aterial omissions *133 from the transcript of the proceedings at trial bearing on the merits of an appeal will require reversal.” Id., 99-0553, p. 20-21 , 803 So.2d at 19 -20 ( (La.
State v. Thomas 204 So. 3d 650 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
424 , 11 L.Ed.2d 331 (1964); (La.
State of Louisiana v. Debbie E. Adams AKA Debbie Adams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
(reversal required when record failed to contain the testimony of a State and defense expert witness); (reversal required when record missing the testimony of four State witnesses and the voir dire of prospective jurors).
State of Louisiana v. Mark Wayne Thibodeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
(reversal required when record failed to contain the testimony of a state and defense expert witness); (reversal required when record was missing the testimony of four state witnesses and the voir dire of prospective jurors).
State v. Thibodeaux 162 So. 3d 665 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
(reversal required when record failed to contain the testimony of a state and defense expert witness); (reversal required when record was missing the testimony of four state witnesses and the voir dire of prospective jurors).
State v. Small 147 So. 3d 1274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
424 , 11 L.Ed.2d 331 (1964)
State of Louisiana v. Ronald Pete La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
424, 11 L.Ed.2d 331 (1964)
State v. Pete 134 So. 3d 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
424 , 11 L.Ed.2d 331 (1964)
State v. Norah 131 So. 3d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Pernell 127 So. 3d 18 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
424 , 11 L.Ed.2d 331 (1964); Landry , 97-0499 p. 3, 751 So.2d at 215 .
State of Louisiana v. Marlon Roberson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
424, 11 L.Ed.2d 331 (1964)
State v. Fortenberry 73 So. 3d 391 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
424 , 11 L.Ed.2d 331 (1964)
State v. Massey 51 So. 3d 808 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
First, “[mjaterial omissions from the transcript of the proceedings at trial bearing on the merits of an appeal will require reversal.” 99-0553 at pp. 20-21, 803 So.2d at 19-20 , (re-versing given that testimony of a state and defense expert witness was missing); (finding omissions material, given that substantial portions of the record were missing, including the testimony of four state witnesses, voir dire examination of prospective jurors, and
State of Louisiana v. Bryan Means La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
424, 11 L.Ed.2d 331 (1964)
State v. Means 25 So. 3d 254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
424 , 11 L.Ed.2d 331 (1964)
State v. Johnson 22 So. 3d 205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
(reversal required when record failed to contain the testimony of a State and defense expert witness); (reversal required when the record is missing the testimony of four State witnesses and the voir dire of prospective jurors).
State v. Stukes 19 So. 3d 1233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
First, “[mjaterial omissions from the transcript of the proceedings at trial bearing on the merits of an appeal will require reversal.” 99-0553 at pp. 20-21, 803 So.2d at 19-20 , (reversing given that testimony of a state and defense expert witness was missing); (finding omissions material, given that substantial portions of the record were missing, including the testimony of four state witnesses, voir dire examination of prospective jurors, and t
State of Louisiana v. Terrell Stipe La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
424, 11 L.Ed.2d 331 (1964)
State v. Stipe 4 So. 3d 189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
424 , 11 L.Ed.2d 331 (1964)
State v. TROQUILLE 986 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Zachary 973 So. 2d 176 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
State v. Scott 952 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
(reversal required when record failed to contain the testimony of a State and defense expert witness); (reversal required when record missing the testimony of four State witnesses and the voir dire of prospective jurors).
State of Louisiana v. Christopher Lane Francois, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Defendant alleges that material omissions in the record require reversal of his conviction
State v. Francois 926 So. 2d 744 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Defendant alleges that material omissions in the record require reversal of his conviction
State v. Scott 913 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
99-0553 at pp. 20-21, 803 So.2d at 19-20 , (reversing given that testimony of a state and defense expert witness was missing); (finding omissions material, given that substantial portions of the record were missing, including the testimony of four state witnesses, voir dire examination of prospective jurors, and t
State v. Boatner 861 So. 2d 149 La. 2003
424 , 11 L.Ed.2d 331 (1964)
State v. Walker 844 So. 2d 1060 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
424 , 11 L.Ed.2d 331 (1964); (La.
State v. Young 839 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
13:961(C)(providing that in criminal cases tried in district court the court reporter "shall record all portions of the proceedings required by law or the court.") [4] (reversing given that testimony of a state and defense expert witness was missing); (finding omissions material given that substantial portions of the record were missing, including the testimony of four State witnesses, voir dire examination of prospective jurors, and th
State v. Simpson 829 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
99-0553 at pp. 20-21, 803 So.2d at 19 -20 ((reversing given that testimony of a state and defense expert witness was missing); (finding omissions material given that substantial portions of the record were missing, including the testimony of four State witnesses, voir dire examination of prospective jurors, and th
State v. Juarbe 824 So. 2d 1240 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
(reversal required when record failed to contain the testimony of a State and defense expert witness); (reversal required when record missing the testimony of four State witnesses and the voir dire of prospective jurors).
State v. Harry 823 So. 2d 987 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
99-05 at pp. 20-21, 803 So.2d at 19 -20 () (reversing given that testimony of a state and defense expert witness was missing); (finding omissions material given that substantial portions of the record were missing, including the testimony of four State witnesses, voir dire examination of prospective jurors, and
State v. Chattman 800 So. 2d 1043 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
(reversal required when record failed to contain the testimony of a State and defense expert witness); (La.
State v. Belt 798 So. 2d 1038 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Frank 803 So. 2d 1 La. 2001
(reversal required when record failed to contain the testimony of a state and defense expert witness); (reversal required when record was missing *20 the testimony of four state witnesses and the voir dire of prospective jurors).
State v. Deruise 802 So. 2d 1224 La. 2001
424 , 11 L.Ed.2d 331 (1964)
State v. Hoffman 768 So. 2d 542 La. 2000
(reversal required when record failed to contain the testimony of a State and defense expert witness); (reversal required when record missing the testimony of four State witnesses and the voir dire of prospective jurors).
State v. Lewis 687 So. 2d 1056 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
State v. Ford 650 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
State v. Clark 644 So. 2d 1130 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Harris 518 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Counterman 461 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
6 Records of the Louisiana Constitutional Convention of 1973: Convention Transcripts, p. 721 for August 15, 1973; Hargrave, The Judiciary Article of the Louisiana Constitution of 1974, 37 La.L.Rev.