Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hickerson v. Protective Nat. Ins. Co., 383 So. 2d 377.
- Hadley v. CENTEX LANDIS CONST. CO., INC. 990 So. 2d 68 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
- Morris v. East Baton Rouge Parish School Board 826 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
- Kiefer v. Southern Freightways, Inc. 686 So. 2d 1041 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
- Jackson v. American Mut. Liability Ins. Co. 676 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
- Billingsley v. Mitchell 676 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
-
Kenny v. Hoschar
675 So. 2d 807
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
held that Section 1386 applied "to ordinary insurance coverage and not to uninsured motorist coverage."
- Rudolph v. Weckesser 675 So. 2d 1158 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
- Breaux v. Richardson 671 So. 2d 1140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
-
Holton v. Brown
658 So. 2d 6
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
22:1386 provided for exhaustion of LIGA’s exposure before the UM coverage would apply.
-
Habeney v. Bellow
645 So. 2d 624
La. 1994
22:1836(A) required a claimant to exhaust his rights against a solvent insurer before proceeding against LIGA, the court held that this obligation did not extend to the solvent UM insurer.
-
Smith v. Ayo
644 So. 2d 1069
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Co., the Louisiana Supreme Court held that La.R.S.
-
Habeney v. Bellow
637 So. 2d 1172
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Co., the court held that this obligation did not extend to the solvent UM insurer.
-
Harris v. Fidelity Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.
635 So. 2d 736
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Co., interpreted this language to exclude u/m insurance.
- Griffy v. Certified Lloyds Plan 636 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
- Saucier v. Favorite 632 So. 2d 11 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
-
Segura v. Frank
630 So. 2d 714
La. 1994
22:1386 where we construed the law "to deem LIGA the insurer with all the obligations of the insolvent insurer."
- Kiefer v. Southern Freightways, Inc. 626 So. 2d 962 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
- Lewis v. Borne 625 So. 2d 273 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
- Rey v. Guidry 618 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
- Cline v. Pacific Marine Ins. Co. 619 So. 2d 1256 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
-
Morris v. Stewart
617 So. 2d 978
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Co. of Omaha, the Louisiana Supreme Court interpreted then R.S.
- Hebert v. Liner 620 So. 2d 294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
-
Segura v. Frank
615 So. 2d 516
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
held that the above provision was intended to apply to ordinary insurance coverage only and did not apply to uninsured motorist coverage.
-
Henderson v. Pacific Marine Ins. Co.
611 So. 2d 822
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
4th Cir.1979), rev'd., (La.
- Bowens v. General Motors Corp. 608 So. 2d 999 La. 1992
-
Blankenship v. Champion Insurance Co.
599 So. 2d 505
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
in brief for the proposition that its uninsured motorist coverage does not apply in this case because L.I.G.A.
-
McMahon v. Louisiana Ins. Guar. Ass'n
596 So. 2d 1384
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
However, the Supreme Court held that the nonduplication provision of the Guaranty Law, La.R.S.
- U.S. Fire Insurance Co. v. State, Worker's Compensation Second Injury Board 590 So. 2d 1310 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
- Dangerfield v. Soto 599 So. 2d 1092 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
- Hebert v. Martin 583 So. 2d 143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
-
Cooper v. Huddy
581 So. 2d 723
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
22:1386 A., for amounts received from uninsured motorists coverage, medical payments under a health insurance policy, (La.
-
Weaver v. Kitchens
556 So. 2d 120
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
Co., H & H Sewer Systems v. Ins.
- La. Ins. Guar. Ass'n v. State, Worker's Compensation Second Injury Bd. 552 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
-
Nasello v. Transit Cas. Co.
530 So. 2d 1114
La. 1988
H & H Sewer Systems, (La.App.
- Nasello v. Transit Cas. Co. 524 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
- McGuire v. Davis Truck Services, Inc. 518 So. 2d 1171 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
- Keller v. Amedeo 512 So. 2d 385 La. 1987
- Senac v. Sandefer 418 So. 2d 543 La. 1982
-
Ursin v. Ins. Guaranty Ass'n
412 So. 2d 1285
La. 1982
Co., nonetheless did allow the claimant to recover his injury claim fully against LIGA without first having to proceed against his uninsured motorist carrier.
-
Senac v. Sandefer
405 So. 2d 1128
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Co., the provisions of R.S.
- Harris v. Lee 387 So. 2d 1145 La. 1980
- Billeaudeau v. Lemoine 386 So. 2d 1359 La. 1980