Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Delta Bank & Trust Co. v. Lassiter, 383 So. 2d 330.

82 citing documents.

Kyle v. Civil Service Com'n 588 So. 2d 1154 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Martin v. Rush's Fabricare Center, Inc. 590 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Professional Occupational Therapy Services, Inc. v. Vanco Human Services, Inc. 572 So. 2d 331 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Montalbano v. State Bd. of Medical Examiners 560 So. 2d 1009 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
Owens v. Jackson 550 So. 2d 359 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
EXCEPTIONS OF NO CAUSE OF ACTION The standard for sustaining an exception of no cause of action was set forth in Delta Bank & as follows: "In ruling on the peremptory exception of no cause of action, the court must presume the correctness of the well pleaded allegations of fact in the plaintiff's petition, and must determine if the fact of the petition presents a case which legally entitles the plaintiff to the relief sought."
Polk v. STATE EX REL. DOTD 538 So. 2d 239 La. 1989
Delta Bank & (La.App.
Polk v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 538 So. 2d 239 La. 1989
Delta Bank & Hagood, v. Pickering, (La.App.
Simon v. Lafayette Automotive, Wrecker & Towing Control Committee 532 So. 2d 283 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
49:964(A); Delta Bank &amp
Cost v. St. Landry Parish School Bd. 528 So. 2d 1048 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
App. 3 Cir.1982), writ denied, *1053 (La.1982); Delta Bank &amp
Gibbs Construction Co. v. State, Department of Labor 525 So. 2d 1039 La. 1988
Loop, Inc. v. Collector of Revenue 523 So. 2d 201 La. 1988
Delta Bank & Bowen v. Doyal, 259 La.
E. Lionel Pavlo Engineering Co. v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development, Office of Highways 521 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Broussard v. Guidry 517 So. 2d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
EXCEPTION OF NO CAUSE OF ACTION The standard for sustaining an exception of no cause of action was set forth by this court when this case was first appealed where we said that: "The standard for sustaining an exception of no cause of action has been set forth by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Delta Bank & as follows: ‘In ruling on the peremptory exception of no cause of action, the court must presume the correctness of the well pleaded allegations of fact in the plaintiff’s petition, and mus
Saxena v. Saxena 518 So. 2d 1098 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
Hillman v. United States Aviation Underwriters 509 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Delta Bank & Sunbelt Factors, (La.App.
Guajardo v. Louisiana State Racing Commission 508 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Delta Bank and Trust Co., supra, [ ] see also Louisiana Administrative Procedure Act, Robert Force and Lawrence Griffith, 42 La.L.
Simon v. Lafayette Automotive Wrecker & Towing Control Committee 506 So. 2d 561 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
4 Cir.1983), and cases cited therein, and that judicial review is presumed to exist, Delta Bank &amp
Acadiana Bank v. Hayes 498 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Delta Bank & State ex rel.
Hughes v. Louisiana State Bd. of Dentistry 490 So. 2d 1097 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
Rue v. Board of Trustees of the City of Alexandria Employees Retirement System 484 So. 2d 272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Delta Bank & (La.App.
Bell v. Dept. of Health and Human Resources 483 So. 2d 945 La. 1986
Sunbelt Factors, Inc. v. Bank of Gonzales 481 So. 2d 648 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Broussard v. Guidry 464 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
itled to a judicial partition in kind of said 31.46 arpent tract to establish precise quantity and boundaries as to the property that plaintiff shall own and to further remove the cloud on plaintiff’s title....” EXCEPTION OF NO CAUSE OF ACTION The standard for sustaining an exception of no cause of action has been set forth by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Delta Bank & as follows: “In ruling on the peremptory exception of no cause of action, the court must presume the correctness of the wel
Psychiatric Institutes of America, Inc. v. Guissinger 464 So. 2d 7 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Const. art. I, § 22; (La.App.
Olbrych v. LOUISIANA STATE RACING COM'N 451 So. 2d 1253 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Hinchman v. Oubre 445 So. 2d 1313 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
As stated in Delta Bank & "* * * Although the correctness of the plaintiff's well pleaded allegations of fact is assumed, the correctness of its conclusions of law is not conceded for purposes of a ruling on an exception of no cause of action.
Corbello v. Sutton 442 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Henning v. Carrier 430 So. 2d 1310 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
In Delta Bank & the Supreme Court stated with regard to the Administrative Procedure Act: "An adjudication is a proceeding resulting in an order or decision.
Super City Boxing Productions, Inc. v. Louisiana State Athletic Commission 423 So. 2d 643 La. 1982
In Delta Bank & we discussed the concept of a property interest: The Fourteenth Amendment of the Federal Constitution provides, in part, “...
Seuzeneau v. Board of Trustees of the Firefighters Pension & Relief Fund for the New Orleans 422 So. 2d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Shores v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York 413 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
The Louisiana Supreme Court stated in Delta Bank & : "Although the correctness of the plaintiff's well pleaded allegations of fact is assumed, the correctness of its conclusions of law is not conceded for purposes of a ruling on an exception of no cause of action.
Hagood v. Pickering 385 So. 2d 405 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
The Supreme Court in the recent case of Delta Bank & held the Commissioner is a state agency as defined in the Administrative Procedures Act and that the provisions of the act do apply to his activities.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by