Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Boutte, 384 So. 2d 773.

62 citing documents.

State v. Laprime 437 So. 2d 1124 La. 1983
[1] Later, the court distinguished Allien and recognized that "[o]rdinarily if hearsay evidence is admitted without objection, it becomes substantive evidence and may be used by the trier of fact to the extent of any probative or persuasive power that it has".
State v. Huntley 438 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
the Court emphasized that "not every erroneous exclusion of disobeying witnesses is reversible error.
State v. Warren 437 So. 2d 836 La. 1983
State v. Armstead 432 So. 2d 837 La. 1983
While a trial judge may in his discretion, refuse to allow a witness to testify after that witness has violated a sequestration order, such a disallowance is disfavored, since, without a *842 showing that the violation occurred with the consent, connivance, procurement or knowledge of the party for whom the witness testified or was to testify, exclusion would unfairly penalize one of the parties in the case and would inhibit the search for
State v. Small 427 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. Parker 421 So. 2d 834 La. 1982
State v. Elizey 407 So. 2d 1204 La. 1981
State v. Fontana 396 So. 2d 1251 La. 1981
State v. Motton 395 So. 2d 1337 La. 1981
State v. Toomer 395 So. 2d 1320 La. 1981
State Ex Rel. Womack v. Blackburn 393 So. 2d 1216 La. 1981
State v. Roy 395 So. 2d 664 La. 1981
[7] See for example, cases in which the court used both standards of review.