Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Wright, 384 So. 2d 399.
- State v. Benjamin 537 So. 2d 369 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- State v. Rousell 501 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
- State v. Dondis 488 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
- State v. Melton 456 So. 2d 192 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
- State v. Raheem 454 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
- State v. Bosworth 415 So. 2d 912 La. 1982
- State v. Lathers 414 So. 2d 678 La. 1982
- State v. Schaeffer 414 So. 2d 730 La. 1982
- State v. Huizar 414 So. 2d 741 La. 1982
- State v. Phillips 412 So. 2d 1036 La. 1982
-
State v. Green
409 So. 2d 563
La. 1982
[4] *567 mandate that his sentence be vacated.
-
State v. Clark
391 So. 2d 1174
La. 1980
this Court held, in cases involving livestock thefts occurring shortly after the statutory penalty reduction, that the trial judge should have considered the legislative amendment before imposing sentence on the defendant.
- State v. Brumfield 390 So. 2d 1335 La. 1980
-
State v. Doxey
384 So. 2d 402
La. 1980
For the reasons assigned in State v. Wright, La.App., , handed down this date, the trial judge should have considered the amendment in imposing sentences on defendant.