Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Doze, 384 So. 2d 351.

15 citing documents.

State v. Brown 256 So. 3d 431 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
1990) ; State v. Doze , (La.
Explained State v. Magee 103 So. 3d 285 La. 2012
State v. Smith 96 So. 3d 678 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Brown,, Plaisance, supra.
Distinguished State v. Adams 897 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
are distinguishable from the instant case.
State v. Plaisance 811 So. 2d 1172 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Everidge 702 So. 2d 680 La. 1997
State v. Pipkins 628 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
held defendant’s state of mind was at issue, but declar-ant’s hearsay evidence could not be used to prove defendant’s motive for killing.
State v. Martin 607 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
and Louisiana Code of Evidence Article 803(3) for the proposition that, because the defendant's state of mind was at issue in determining the voluntariness of the confessions, the school records should have been introduced into evidence at the hearing.
State v. Brown 562 So. 2d 868 La. 1990
Comment 803(3)(c); [declarant's state of mind was not at issue; however, the defendant's state of mind was at issue but the evidence could not be used to prove his motive for the killing].
Buckbee v. United Gas Pipe Line Co. Inc. 561 So. 2d 76 La. 1990
(citing McCormick, Evidence § 249 (Cleary ed. 1972)).
State v. Brown 549 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Trahan 543 So. 2d 984 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Riley 532 So. 2d 1174 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. DiLosa 529 So. 2d 14 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Distinguished State v. Martin 458 So. 2d 454 La. 1984