DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Morvant, 384 So. 2d 765.

53 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Dewayne Fitzgerald Poullard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated the principles under which the admissibility of a confession must be judged.
  • State of Louisiana v. Joshua Darelle Lewis La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
  • STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS RAY DELOACH AKA RAY A. DELOACH La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated the principles under which the admissibility of a confession must be judged.
  • State of Louisiana v. Brady J. Harrington La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated the principles under which the admissibility of a confession must be judged.
  • State v. Harrington 129 So. 3d 38 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated the principles under which the admissibility of a confession must be judged.
  • State of Louisiana v. Rasheed Ali Sterling La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated the principles under which the admissibility of a confession must be judged.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jonathan Edward Boyer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated the principles under which the admissibility of a confession must be judged.
  • State v. Boyer 56 So. 3d 1119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated the principles under which the admissibility of a confession must be judged.
  • State v. Wright 978 So. 2d 1062 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Brown 965 So. 2d 580 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated the principles under which the admissibility of a confession must be judged.
  • State v. Allen 942 So. 2d 1244 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    State v. Roddy, the supreme court stated the principles under which the admissibility of a confession must be judged.
  • State v. Robertson 927 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    the supreme court stated the principles under which the admissibility of a confession must be judged.
  • State v. Roshell 916 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated the principles under which the admissibility of a confession must be judged.
  • State v. Bowers 909 So. 2d 1038 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated the principles under which the admissibility of a confession must be judged.
  • State v. Turner 859 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated the principles under which the admissibility of a confession must be judged.
  • State v. McLelland 860 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    State v. Holloway, 37,021, p. 10 (La.App.
  • State v. George 855 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    568 (1897); State v. Roddy, supra .
  • State v. Trotter 852 So. 2d 1247 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated the principles under which the admissibility of a confession must be judged.
  • State v. Holloway 847 So. 2d 200 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Nightengale 818 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated the principles under which the admissibility of a confession must be judged.
  • State v. Franklin 803 So. 2d 1057 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated the principles under which the admissibility of a confession must be judged.
  • State v. Jeselink 799 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    the Louisiana supreme court stated the principles under which the admissibility of a confession must be judged.
  • State v. Ouzts 777 So. 2d 1286 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    State v. Henderson, supra .
  • State v. Roddy 756 So. 2d 1272 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    1980), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated the principles under which the admissibility of a confession must be judged.
  • State v. Gaspard 709 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    [ State v.] Leonard, [ (La.App.
  • State v. Gaspard 685 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    [ State v. ] Leonard, supra [ (La.App.
  • State v. Matthews 649 So. 2d 1022 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • State v. Clay 623 So. 2d 211 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated the principles under which the admissibility of a confession must be judged.
  • State v. Leonard 605 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
  • State v. Powell 598 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
  • State v. White 543 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Massey 535 So. 2d 1135 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Cupit 508 So. 2d 996 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Obney 505 So. 2d 211 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
    3051 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1138 (1980), See also
  • State v. Freeman 503 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Siggers 490 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Elkins 486 So. 2d 1053 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    art. 213; 1 State v. Elliot, 407 So.2d *1056 659 (La.1981)
  • State v. Harper 485 So. 2d 224 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Maiden 463 So. 2d 848 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Thomas 460 So. 2d 1069 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Dunn 454 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Ruffin 448 So. 2d 1274 La. 1984
  • State v. Sterling 444 So. 2d 273 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Ruffin 434 So. 2d 1246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Commodore, *1249 418 So.2d at 1333
  • State v. Hall 434 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    Bram v. United States, 168 U.S. 532 , 18 S.Ct.
  • State v. Tanner 432 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Square 433 So. 2d 104 La. 1983
  • State v. Buckley 426 So. 2d 103 La. 1983
    [3] *108 While information from an informant may provide sufficient probable cause for an arrest, it is often the case that the information only contributes to the articulable facts needed for probable cause.
  • State Ex Rel. Bailey v. City of West Monroe 418 So. 2d 570 La. 1982
  • State v. Hargrave 411 So. 2d 1058 La. 1982