Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bonanno, 384 So. 2d 355.
- State v. Lathen 862 So. 2d 1119 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. Jarrett 862 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. Young 862 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
-
State v. Taves
861 So. 2d 144
La. 2003
1979), and we made clear in the opinion that the determination of whether a sentence which otherwise falls within the range of punishment provided by the legislature for a particular offense is excessive, i.e., so disproportionate to the offense that it represents the needless infliction of pain and suffering, entails more than a priori judgments by an appellate court.
- State v. Bates 859 So. 2d 841 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. Fuller 859 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. Jackson 855 So. 2d 989 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. Brock 855 So. 2d 939 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. Crutchfield 855 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
- State v. Dale 852 So. 2d 1167 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. McCall 852 So. 2d 1162 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. Brown 852 So. 2d 1234 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. Eason 850 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. Robinson 848 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. Shaw 850 So. 2d 868 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
-
State v. Sayers
850 So. 2d 930
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
State v. Sutton, 32,-871 (La.App.2d Cir.1/26/2000), .
- State v. Littleberry 850 So. 2d 1015 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. Gipson 850 So. 2d 973 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. Odell 850 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. Roland 850 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. Edison 847 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. Lee 847 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. Logwood 847 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. Sanders 842 So. 2d 1260 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. Glosson 843 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. Green 842 So. 2d 1208 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. Howard 842 So. 2d 1233 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. Mandosia 842 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. Anderson 842 So. 2d 1222 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. Feaster 840 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. Boykin 840 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. Wright 839 So. 2d 1001 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. Snow 839 So. 2d 988 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. Hayes 845 So. 2d 542 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
-
State v. Day
838 So. 2d 74
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Furthermore, the court stated, To determine whether the penalty is so grossly disproportionate to the crime we must consider the punishment and the crime in light of the harm to society caused by its commission and determine whether the penalty is so disproportionate to the crime committed as to shock our sense of
- State v. Norris 837 So. 2d 723 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. Scott 836 So. 2d 1180 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. Smith 839 So. 2d 1 La. 2003
- State v. Kirsch 836 So. 2d 390 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
- State v. Hunter 834 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
- State v. Guerra 834 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
- State v. James 833 So. 2d 1162 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
- State v. Quiambao 833 So. 2d 1103 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
- State v. Robinson 833 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
-
State v. Paddio
832 So. 2d 1120
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
3 Cir. 2/1/95), , writ denied, 95-537 (La.6/23/95), ( ).
- State v. Cooks 833 So. 2d 1034 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
- State v. Dallas 830 So. 2d 1113 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
- State v. Gay 830 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
- State v. Gay 830 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
- State v. Floyd 830 So. 2d 384 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002