DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bonanno, 384 So. 2d 355.

1679 citing documents.

  • State v. Robinson 125 So. 3d 1228 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Hackett 122 So. 3d 1164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Peters 123 So. 3d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. York 121 So. 3d 1226 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Mills 120 So. 3d 802 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98)
  • State v. Smith 117 So. 3d 1273 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Allen 117 So. 3d 311 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Stephens 114 So. 3d 1265 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Smith 114 So. 3d 1229 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. George 115 So. 3d 730 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Watson 135 So. 3d 693 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Woods 115 So. 3d 708 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Humphreys 114 So. 3d 1184 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Veal 116 So. 3d 779 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Slattery 116 So. 3d 804 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Cleveland 115 So. 3d 578 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Fletcher 112 So. 3d 1031 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Hogan 113 So. 3d 1195 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Parker 112 So. 3d 366 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    In making that determination, “we must consider the punishment and the crime in light of the harm to society caused by its commission and determine whether the penalty is so disproportionate to the crime committed as to shock our sense of justice.”
  • State v. Goosby 111 So. 3d 494 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Carey 110 So. 3d 221 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Holmes 110 So. 3d 242 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Banks 110 So. 3d 252 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Thomas 110 So. 3d 640 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Womack 109 So. 3d 418 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Williams 108 So. 3d 319 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Davis 108 So. 3d 833 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Wynne 108 So. 3d 864 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Sims 106 So. 3d 709 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    (1980); (To be found excessive, the penalty must be “so grossly disproportionate to the crime committed, in light of the harm caused to society, as to shock our sense of justice”).
  • State of Louisiana v. Charles J. Doyle AKA - Joey Doyle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    A sentence is excessive if “it is grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime or if it is nothing more than the purposeless and needless imposition of pain and suffering.”
  • State of Louisiana v. Charles J. Doyle AKA- Joey Doyle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    A sentence is excessive if “it is grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime or if it is nothing more than the purposeless and needless imposition of pain and suffering.”
  • State v. Harris 105 So. 3d 914 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2012
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Terry 108 So. 3d 126 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Lewis 107 So. 3d 771 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
  • State of Louisiana v. Ricky W. Coleman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    A sentence is excessive if “it is grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime or if it is nothing more than the purposeless and needless imposition of pain and suffering.” (La.
  • State v. Coleman 101 So. 3d 580 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    A sentence is excessive if “it is grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime or if it is nothing more than the purposeless and needless imposition of pain and suffering.”
  • State v. Glover 106 So. 3d 129 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Small 106 So. 3d 574 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
  • State v. White 106 So. 3d 564 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Martinez 135 So. 3d 659 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Palmer 105 So. 3d 96 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Wilson 99 So. 3d 1067 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    In making that determination, “we must consider the punishment and the crime in light of the harm to society caused by its commission and determine whether the penalty is so disproportionate to the crime committed as to shock our sense of justice.”
  • State v. Tatum 103 So. 3d 550 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. *557 Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Jones 103 So. 3d 498 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
  • State v. Barrett 104 So. 3d 21 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Guess 104 So. 3d 41 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Odom 104 So. 3d 61 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.01/14/03)
  • State v. Hough 103 So. 3d 477 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
  • State v. Hardman 103 So. 3d 472 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Savoy 93 So. 3d 1279 La. 2012
    In determining whether a punishment is grossly disproportionate to the severity of the offense or constitutes nothing more than needless *1283 infliction of pain and suffering, this Court has repeatedly emphasized that sentence review under the Louisiana constitution does not provide an appellate court with a vehicle for substituting its judgment for that of a trial judge as to what punishment is more appropriate in a given case.