Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Williams, 384 So. 2d 779.

48 citing documents.

State v. England 268 So. 3d 1178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Williams , , 780 (La.
State v. Gay 136 So. 3d 919 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
State v. Russell 73 So. 3d 991 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Benny Christopher Kimbrough La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Kimbrough 38 So. 3d 1258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. MARKRAY 35 So. 3d 453 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Shelton 39 So. 3d 601 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Dominique J. Casson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Casson 2 So. 3d 1246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Myers 978 So. 2d 595 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Gipson 942 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Dodson 942 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Harvey 940 So. 2d 40 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Morrison, supra .
State v. Jones 935 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Morrison, supra.
State v. Mendenhall 930 So. 2d 1196 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Filer 762 So. 2d 1080 La. 2000
art. 556.1(A) incorporates this Court's preference for personal colloquies between a trial judge and a defendant entering a guilty plea, ("The only realistic means of assuring that the trial judge leaves a record adequate for any later review is to require that the record contain on its face direct evidence that the accused was made aware by the trial judge of his right to a jury trial, his right to confront accusers, and his privilege a
State v. Dickerson 760 So. 2d 573 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Walker 747 So. 2d 133 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Morrison, supra .
State v. Kunzman 741 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
*121 State v. Morrison, supra .
State v. Deroche 674 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Shelton 621 So. 2d 769 La. 1993
[14] the same standard applicable to the use of guilty pleas in multiple offender hearings also applies to the review of guilty pleas when they are directly attacked either on appeal, in a post-conviction proceeding, or in a habeas corpus action, later cases involving these other procedural circumstances are rele
State v. Morrison 599 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Longo 560 So. 2d 530 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Collins 546 So. 2d 1246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
(on rehearing) (La.1982)
State v. Verrett 536 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Wilkerson 533 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Stansell 494 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Godejohn, supra
State v. Woods 435 So. 2d 422 La. 1983
State v. Buckenburger 428 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Godejohn 425 So. 2d 750 La. 1983
relied on by the majority, the issue of proper Boykinization was raised on appeal as an assigned error.
State v. Bland 419 So. 2d 1227 La. 1982
He contends that when defendant objects the state must introduce a transcript of the plea of guilty to sustain its burden
State v. Bosworth 415 So. 2d 912 La. 1982
1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969); State ex rel.
State v. Age 417 So. 2d 1183 La. 1982
State v. Trahan 412 So. 2d 1294 La. 1982
State v. Lawson 410 So. 2d 1101 La. 1982
1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969)
State v. Washington 406 So. 2d 191 La. 1981
this court stated that in order to satisfy the Boykin mandate in a way which can be properly reviewed on appeal, the record should: "...
State v. Washington 406 So. 2d 191 La. 1981
this court stated that in order to satisfy the Boykin mandate in a way which can be properly reviewed on appeal, the record should: “..
State v. McGinnis 413 So. 2d 1307 La. 1981
State v. Jones 404 So. 2d 1192 La. 1981
State v. Halsell 403 So. 2d 688 La. 1981
State v. Cusher 400 So. 2d 601 La. 1981
I do not agree with the majority view expressed in footnote 2 that "where, (La.
State v. Warren 402 So. 2d 662 La. 1981
I do not agree with the majority view expressed in footnote 2 that "where, a plea is relatively recent [1979] the colloquy with the trial judge must affirmatively establish a waiver of the three constitutional Boykin rights ...".
State v. Williams 400 So. 2d 868 La. 1981
State v. Nicholas 397 So. 2d 1308 La. 1981
State v. Williams 392 So. 2d 448 La. 1980
589 , 30 L.Ed.2d 592 (1972) or to impeach his credibility.
State v. LaFleur 391 So. 2d 445 La. 1980
State v. Beatty 391 So. 2d 828 La. 1980
Distinguished State v. Dunn 390 So. 2d 525 La. 1980
to be clearly distinguishable from the instant case.