Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Jones v. CITY OF BATON ROUGE, ETC., 388 So. 2d 737.

166 citing documents.

  • Wilkinson v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 400 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
  • LeBlanc v. K-Mart Apparel Fashions Corp. 399 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
    Jones v. City of Baton Rouge—Parish of East Baton Rouge, Broussard v. Pennsylvania *756 Millers Mutual Insurance Company, (La.App.
  • Hall v. City of New Orleans 400 So. 2d 265 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
  • Ferguson v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. 398 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
    In Jones v. City of Baton Rouge, Etc., [2] strict liability was imposed upon the municipality when plaintiff fell into a defective catch-basin.
  • Simoneaux v. Davis 397 So. 2d 835 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
    (1981), (1980) in stating: "An injured party seeking damages under art. 2317 need not prove negligence, that is, that any particular act or omission on the part of the defendant caused his injuries.
  • Nash v. Draughon Business School 397 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    2d Cir. 1981), citing Jones v. City of Baton Rouge, etc.
  • Shipp v. City of Alexandria 395 So. 2d 727 La. 1981
    citing Loescher v. Parr, supra, at 446.
  • Sepulvado v. State ex rel. Department of Highways 395 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    art. 2317 as construed by the supreme court in Jones v. City of Baton Rouge, Etc., (La.
  • Smith v. Town of Logansport 395 So. 2d 888 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
  • Collins v. Parish of East Baton Rouge 398 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    The doctrine of Loescher, which holds the custodian of an immovable liable in damages for injury caused by its vice or defect, even in the absence of proof of negligence, subject to certain defenses not here pertinent, was applied to public bodies in the recent decision of the state’s
  • Jennings v. City of Alexandria 394 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    Supreme Court Docket No. 66480, that municipalities and other public bodies may be held liable for damages caused by things in their custody, it is clear that plaintiff has failed to establish by a preponderance of evidence the elements necessary for attaching liability to the defendant under the provisions
  • Godwin v. Government Employees Ins. Co. 394 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
    In Jones v. The City of Baton Rouge—Parish of East Baton Rouge, the Louisiana Supreme Court summarized the plaintiff's burden of proof in a strict liability action, the court therein stated: "Because the responsibility for preventing the unreasonable risk of injury to others is unconditional, the injured party seeking damages under article 2317 need not prove that any p
  • Stablier v. City of Baton Rouge 393 So. 2d 148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    Jones v. City of Baton Rouge, La., (1980), held that LSA-C.C.
  • Derouen v. Dept. of Transp. & Development 392 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
    was rejected by the Supreme Court of Louisiana in Jones v. City of Baton Rouge, etc.
  • LeGrand v. State ex rel. Department of Highways 390 So. 2d 957 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    (1980), has eliminated the requirement of knowledge of the defect in the highway as a condition precedent to liability.
  • Baggett v. City of Bogalusa 391 So. 2d 1210 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    v. The City of Baton Rouge-Parish of East Baton Rouge, on the docket of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and its application of LSA-C.C.