Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Suire v. Primeaux, 363 So. 2d 963.

13 citing documents.

Deborah Marie Horaist v. Edward A. Pratt and Jean Johnson Pratt La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
William Terry Ebarb and Dewanna N. Ebarb v. Unopened Succ. of Alfair Jones Sepulvado La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Norman Michael Sepulvado v. William Terry Ebarb La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Ebarb v. Unopened Succession Sepulvado 241 So. 3d 1103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
art. 3476 ; Suire v. Primeaux , (La.App.
Bertha Mae Stokes v. Rose Clark Reeves La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Stokes v. Reeves 966 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Phillips v. Fisher 634 So. 2d 1305 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Perrin v. Miller 534 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
art. 3653 (1960); See also, (La.App.
Avery v. Nash 448 So. 2d 841 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
GENERAL AM. OIL CO. OF TEXAS v. Williams, Inc. 441 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Finley v. Hailey 389 So. 2d 829 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
The first specification of error is that the lower court was not empowered to recognize the defendants’ ownership in its judgment because their pleas of prescription were not set forth in a reconventional demand, (La.App.
Yount v. Copellar 374 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Suire v. Primeaux 365 So. 2d 243 La. 1978