Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Skipper, 387 So. 2d 592.

30 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Robert Crooms, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State Of Louisiana v. Jesse Schiele La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. Durell James Collins La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. Edward Brooks La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
State v. Gross 273 So. 3d 317 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Wells 262 So. 3d 294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Skipper , , 594 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Archie Lewis Charles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
” In Clark, this court acknowledged the supreme court’s footnote in Morris, but felt that remanding the case for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the defendant executed a knowing and intelligent waiver was a “prudent safeguard of this fundamental right.” Id.
State of Louisiana v. Lloyd Fuslier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
” In Clark, this court acknowledged the supreme court’s footnote in Morris, but felt that remanding the case for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the defendant executed a knowing and intelligent waiver was a “prudent safeguard of this fundamental right.” Id.
State v. Fuslier 954 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Wallis 807 So. 2d 1082 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
art. 615; State v. Hester, 99-426 (La.App.
State v. Eames 714 So. 2d 210 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Morris 615 So. 2d 327 La. 1993
State v. Bishop 571 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Isaac 544 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
State v. Alfred 510 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Cupit 508 So. 2d 996 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Wright 506 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Freeman 500 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Nash 494 So. 2d 1329 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
1 State v. Humphrey, 412 So.2d *1332 507 (La.1982)
State v. Sampson 480 So. 2d 952 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Capano 466 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Cockerham, supra.
State v. Landry 463 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
Watermeier v. Watermeier 462 So. 2d 1272 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
Other cases allowing minor children to testify, age six or less, include: [four years old]; [five years old]; State v. Nails, 255 La.
State v. Ring 461 So. 2d 1162 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Kelly 456 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Casimier 454 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
The Louisiana Supreme Court has long held that the trial judge's determination of the competency of a witness is entitled to great weight on review because the judge has the opportunity to see and hear the witness, and such finding of competency should not be disturbed absent a showing of manifest error.
State v. Miles 450 So. 2d 1067 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Cockerham 442 So. 2d 1257 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
State v. Foy 439 So. 2d 433 La. 1983
State v. Dees 439 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by