Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bazile, 386 So. 2d 349.

33 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Isaiah M. Childs La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
State v. Newsome 265 So. 3d 1223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
4 Cir. 2/13/08), , 1109 (the prosecution must establish the admissibility of a purported confession by showing that it was voluntarily made), and State v. Bazile , , 353 (La.1980) (on a motion to suppress, the burden of proof shifts to the prosecution to prove the admissibility of evidence once the defendant makes an initial showing that his rights have been violated by a warrantless search).
State of Louisiana v. Simcoe Cole AKA Simco W. Cole La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Odenbaugh 82 So. 3d 215 La. 2011
-1169 (La.1991) (failure to make Batson objection waived issue on appeal); (review of improper exclusion of blacks from jury not preserved for appeal); (objection to failure to sequester jury at an earlier time waived); (improper procedure for selecting venire not reviewable when objection was made after jury was sworn).
State v. Brown 36 So. 3d 974 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
4 Cir. 2/13/08), (the prosecution must establish the admissibility of a purported confession by showing that it was voluntarily made), (on a motion to suppress, the burden of proof shifts to the prosecution to prove the admissibility of evidence once the defendant makes an initial showing that his rights have been violated by a warrantless search).
State of Louisiana v. Austin Blake Ceaser La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Ceaser 21 So. 3d 1122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure Article 703 “has been construed in light of United States Supreme Court decisions to mean that once the defendant makes the initial showing at a motion to suppress hearing that a warrantless search occurred, the burden [then] shifts to the state-”
State v. Montgomery 974 So. 2d 110 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Brister 966 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
State v. Tilley 767 So. 2d 6 La. 2000
1991) (failure to make Batson objection waived issue on appeal); (review of improper exclusion of blacks from jury not preserved for appeal); (objection to failure to sequester jury at an earlier time waived); (improper procedure for selecting venire not reviewable where objection was made after jury was sworn).
State v. Snyder 750 So. 2d 832 La. 1999
(failure to make Batson objection waived issue on appeal); (review of improper exclusion of blacks from jury not preserved for appeal); (objection to failure to sequester jury at an earlier time waived); (improper procedure for selecting venire not reviewable where objection was made after jury was sworn); (objection to State's use of peremptory challenges raised for first time on appeal came too late); State v. Landry, 262 La.
State v. Green 683 So. 2d 1292 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Torres 580 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
State v. Edwards 569 So. 2d 597 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Griffin 568 So. 2d 198 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Winzer 545 So. 2d 1259 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Massey 529 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
State v. McGraw 527 So. 2d 435 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Brady 524 So. 2d 1356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Mims 524 So. 2d 526 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Wilson 524 So. 2d 1251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
art. 841 states that: “An irregularity or error cannot be availed of after verdict unless it was objected to at the time of occurrence.” The Louisiana Supreme Court has applied the rule of contemporaneous objection to irregularities occurring during the selection of a
State v. White 495 So. 2d 340 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
“The statements of the out-of-court witness [es] to the crime whether true or not formed the basis for the officer to believe that an offense had been commit *343 ted and that the defendant had committed the offense.”
State v. Thompson 489 So. 2d 1364 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Graham 486 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Spencer 446 So. 2d 1197 La. 1984
a purported error in the selection of the jury cannot be availed of on appeal unless a contemporaneous objection is lodged, pursuant to La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Tanner 432 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Banks 428 So. 2d 544 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
State v. Alexander 430 So. 2d 621 La. 1983
State v. Morris 429 So. 2d 111 La. 1983
art. 841; where an objection to improper voir dire after the jury was sworn was held to be untimely, with State v. St.
State v. Winn 412 So. 2d 1337 La. 1982
State v. Keller 403 So. 2d 693 La. 1981
Overruled State v. Hudgins 400 So. 2d 889 La. 1981
: "Hearsay evidence is testimony in court, or written evidence, of an out-of-court statement offered to show the truth of the matter asserted therein and resting for its value upon the credibility of the out-of-court asserter.
State v. Smith 400 So. 2d 587 La. 1981