Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Baker, 389 So. 2d 1289.
- State v. Evins 626 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
- State v. Loera 530 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
-
State v. Tilley
525 So. 2d 716
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
and State v. Guidry , the affidavits did not state that the contraband was inside the respective defendants' residences.
- State v. Slaid 508 So. 2d 597 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
-
State v. Smith
473 So. 2d 366
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
United States v. Bowers, 534 F.2d 186 (9th Cir.1976).” Here, too, the affidavit, taken in a whole, even with the Porche segment excluded, does itemize more than enough information to support a reasonable determination that probable cause existed to search both the s
-
State v. Durand
461 So. 2d 1090
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Mena, supra at 152 ; State v. St.
- State v. Kleinpeter 449 So. 2d 1043 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
- State v. Dillon 419 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
- State v. Tate 407 So. 2d 1133 La. 1981
-
State v. Poree
406 So. 2d 546
La. 1981
United States v. Bowers, 534 F.2d 186 (9th Cir. 1976).
- State v. Tate 407 So. 2d 1131 La. 1981
- State v. Morstein 404 So. 2d 916 La. 1981
- State v. Mena 399 So. 2d 149 La. 1981