DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Toledano, 391 So. 2d 817.

32 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Xavier Watson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
  • State of Louisiana Versus Ivory D. Franklin La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
  • State v. Williams 259 So. 3d 563 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    State v. Toledano , , 820 (1980).
  • State v. Henderson 136 So. 3d 223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    art. 609.1 does not generally permit the introduction of evidence of juvenile adjudications; however, to show that a precedent was set that allows the discovery of juvenile records and maintains that the instant case falls within the ambit of what the court in Toledano concluded: The extreme importance and constitutional status of the right to confrontation (which includes the reasonable opportunity to
  • State v. Rubens 83 So. 3d 30 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    mportance and constitutional status of the right to confrontation (which includes the reasonable opportunity to impeach the witness’s Incredibility) requires that any statutory right to confidentiality of juvenile proceedings under these circumstances must yield if the discrediting value of a prior juvenile adjudication is such that its disclosure is essential to a fair trial.” on rehearing.
  • State v. Anders 941 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State of Louisiana v. Quantell Derell Anders La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Nguyen 888 So. 2d 900 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
  • State v. Perkins 852 So. 2d 989 La. 2003
    1105 , 39 L.Ed.2d 347 (1974)
  • State v. Smith 710 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Dunn 651 So. 2d 1378 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
    at 1110 , 39 L.Ed.2d at 353 ; -755 (La.1985); -1060 (La.1981)
  • State v. Fisher 649 So. 2d 604 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
  • State v. Francis 635 So. 2d 305 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
    However, appeal after remand, the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that: The extreme importance and constitutional status of the right to confrontation (which includes the reasonable opportunity to impeach the witness' credibility) requires that any statutory right to confidentiality of
  • State v. Carr 620 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    on rehearing the court remanded the defendant's manslaughter conviction to the trial court for a determination of whether or not the impeachment value of any juvenile adjudications of a co-defendant, who testified against the defendant, outweighed the witness' statutory interest in the confidentiality of an
  • State v. S.P. 608 So. 2d 232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
  • State v. SP 608 So. 2d 232 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
  • State v. Williams 545 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
  • State v. Muntz 534 So. 2d 1317 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
    [1105] at 1110, 39 L.Ed.2d [347] at 353 [1974]; -755 (La.1985); -1060 (La.1981)
  • State Ex Rel. Nicholas v. State 520 So. 2d 377 La. 1988
  • State v. Alford 521 So. 2d 456 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Ruff 504 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    1105 , 39 L.Ed.2d 347 (1974)
  • State v. Haywood 491 So. 2d 1318 La. 1986
  • State v. Morgan 454 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    1105, 1112 , 39 L.Ed.2d 347 (1974)
  • State v. Vaughn 448 So. 2d 1260 La. 1984
  • State v. Robinson 449 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Smith 437 So. 2d 802 La. 1983
    1105, 1112 , 39 L.Ed.2d 347 (1974)
  • State v. Vaughn 431 So. 2d 358 La. 1983
  • State v. Toledano 408 So. 2d 1252 La. 1982
  • State v. Bryan 398 So. 2d 1019 La. 1981
  • State v. Davenport 399 So. 2d 201 La. 1981
  • State v. Hillard 398 So. 2d 1057 La. 1981
    (1980), we held that when the defense moves for production of the juvenile's *1060 record while cross-examining an alleged co-participant, a prior juvenile adjudication may be sufficiently probative of the witness's veracity to necessitate disclosure.
  • State v. Toledano 396 So. 2d 1242 La. 1981