DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Byrd, 385 So. 2d 248.

167 citing documents.

  • State v. McCue 484 So. 2d 889 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Williams 479 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    where such a fear was held not to be reasonable.
  • State v. Brown 478 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Burell 476 So. 2d 1181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Lee 467 So. 2d 1341 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Papillion 467 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Grissom 467 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Ford 467 So. 2d 1243 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    See CCrP Art. 821 and Official Revision Comment; Art. 851; (La.App.
  • State v. George 466 So. 2d 678 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Hines 465 So. 2d 958 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Hoyt 464 So. 2d 841 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Landry 463 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
    The Jackson standard of review for sufficiency of the evidence, is whether, after reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State v. Scott 461 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Stewart 458 So. 2d 1289 La. 1984
  • State v. Andrews 452 So. 2d 687 La. 1984
    and the subsequent amendment to C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Robertson 454 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Hunter 454 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Honore 451 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
    The Jackson standard of review for sufficiency of the evidence, is whether, after reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State v. Scott 451 So. 2d 1135 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 ] (1979); ” Here, the trial judge obviously felt that the adduced proof, which included some direct evidence along with the circumstantial evidence establishing Scott’s general criminal intent, was sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the necessary elements of the crime Scott was charged with.
  • State v. Butler 450 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Camp 446 So. 2d 1207 La. 1984
  • State v. Grigsby 445 So. 2d 176 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Rodrigue 441 So. 2d 1274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    According to the Comment following article 821, this article is a
  • State v. Howard 441 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    held that: [W]hen it is clear from the verdict that the trial judge or jury necessarily found the elements of a lesser and included offense had been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, and the state, constrained by the double jeopardy clause, cannot seek anew a conviction on the greater offense, a remand
  • State v. Alexander 437 So. 2d 991 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Willis 438 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Davis 431 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Kinney 431 So. 2d 16 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Jones 426 So. 2d 1323 La. 1983
  • State v. Thomas 427 So. 2d 428 La. 1983
  • State v. Ricks 428 So. 2d 794 La. 1983
    only four convictions of lesser included offenses, which are not responsive verdicts in LSA-C.Cr.P.
  • State Ex Rel. Elaire v. Blackburn 424 So. 2d 246 La. 1982
  • State v. Greenway 422 So. 2d 1146 La. 1982
  • State v. Willie 422 So. 2d 1128 La. 1982
    Hence, we reversed the conviction and sentence and remanded the case to the district court with instructions to enter a judgment of conviction of attempted forcible rape and to impose a sentence for that crime.
  • State v. Narcisse 420 So. 2d 947 La. 1982
    wherein this court, held that discharge of a defendant on the ground of insufficiency of the evidence is not necessary or proper when the evidence supports a conviction on a lesser and included offense which is a legislatively authorized responsive verdict, is not applicable to the instant case where the ev
  • State v. Jett 419 So. 2d 844 La. 1982
  • State v. Talbert 416 So. 2d 68 La. 1982
  • State v. Tuckson 414 So. 2d 360 La. 1982
  • State in Interest of Pigott 413 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
  • State v. Stephenson 412 So. 2d 553 La. 1982
  • State v. Phillips 412 So. 2d 1061 La. 1982
    [3] wherein this court held that discharge of a defendant on the ground of insufficiency of the evidence is not necessary or proper when the evidence supports a conviction on a lesser and included offense which is a legislatively authorized responsive verdict, is not applicable to the instant case where the evi
  • State v. Parker 411 So. 2d 449 La. 1982
  • State v. Ramoin 410 So. 2d 1010 La. 1982
  • State v. Goiner 410 So. 2d 1085 La. 1982
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Love 410 So. 2d 1045 La. 1982
  • State v. Green 409 So. 2d 563 La. 1982
  • State v. Rives 407 So. 2d 1195 La. 1981
  • State v. Parish 405 So. 2d 1080 La. 1981
  • State v. Krause 405 So. 2d 832 La. 1981
    Furthermore, since the state failed to introduce a proper certificate of recertification, I also agree that the trial court could not properly have found defendant guilty of driving while intoxicated, first offense
  • State v. White 404 So. 2d 1202 La. 1981